By Randy W. Elder, M.Ed.
Ruth A. Shults, Ph.D., M.P.H
David A. Sleet, Ph.D., F.A.A.H.B.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 |
State BAC Limits
.08 BAC Law Enacted Before 2001
.08 BAC Law Enacted in 2001
.08 BAC Law Not Enacted
|
ATLANTA - The benefits of an objective
blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit are
clear. Now the national debate centers on
what the appropriate level should be.
The BAC limit of .10 percent that currently
exists in many U.S. states is among
the highest in the world. The limits in other
countries range from zero (Czech Republic)
to .08 percent. There are consequences
attached to setting a BAC limit so high that
a 180-pound man can drink five bottles of
beer and still be under the legal limit.
Laboratory studies have found that
some basic skills required for driving start
to deteriorate at BACs below .02 percent.
At this level, drivers have attention problems
such as staying in their lane while
watching for other cars and pedestrians. By
the time BACs reach .08 percent, most
driving skills are seriously impaired.
Studies of actual crashes point to similar
effects. Starting from levels as low as
.02 percent BAC, the chances of being
involved in a crash steadily rise as BAC
increases. As BAC rises above .08 percent,
a driver's risk of being involved in a fatal
crash increases from 11 to 52 times that
for a sober driver. The evidence clearly indicates
that people with BACs of .08 percent
and above don't drive as well as sober people
and that they have a much greater
chance of being involved in a crash.
But do laws that reduce the BAC limit
to .08 percent actually save lives? To
address this question, scientists at the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
reviewed and integrated existing U.S.
research that assessed the impact of
changing the BAC limit from .10 percent to
.08 percent. Our review combined the
results of nine studies covering 16 states
that had lowered their BACs to .08 percent.
The law's change was consistently associated
with a lower level of alcohol-related
crashes. On average, deaths from alcohol-related
crashes dropped seven percent after
.08 percent BAC laws were adopted.
It is estimated if all 50 states had .08
percent BAC laws, 300 to 500 lives would
be saved annually. It is likely that many
more serious injuries would also be prevented.
The effects of the lower BAC laws were
not limited to drivers with BACs in the .08
percent to .10 percent range. Several studies
found that deaths among drinking drivers
with BACs of .10 percent and higher
declined by about the same amount as for
those with lower BACs.
The one study that looked at fatal
crashes involving drivers with BACs of .15
percent and higher also found similar
results. It seems that even these drivers,
who may be hard-core drinkers, are
deterred by the law change.
Based on the results of this review, the
independent Task Force on Community
Preventive Services strongly recommended
that states adopt .08 percent BAC laws to
help reduce deaths resulting from drinking
and driving. This recommendation echoes
one made more than a decade ago in the
U.S. Surgeon General's Report on Drinking
and Driving.
These recommendations for .08 percent
BAC laws were recently put into practice
by the Fiscal Year 2001 Department of
Transportation and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act. The Act requires states
to adopt .08 percent BAC laws by October
2003 or lose a portion of highway funds.
Since the passage of this bill, nine states
have made the change, bringing the total
number of states with .08 percent BAC
laws to 28.
Implementing .08 percent BAC laws is
only one step in the fight against drinking
and driving. Continued progress will require
concerted efforts on two fronts - research
on the effectiveness of other interventions
and policies to reduce drinking and driving,
and a commitment to putting prevention
into practice at the state and local level.
Research in this article was awarded the
Department of Health and Human Services
Secretary's Award for Distinguished Service. It
appears in the Nov., 2001 supplement of the
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
(Volume 21, Supplement 4); www.cdc.gov