washingtonpost.com  > Politics > Elections > 2004 Election

Kerry Decries Bush's Military Realignment

By Lois Romano
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 19, 2004; Page A06

CINCINNATI, Aug. 18 -- Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kerry on Wednesday assailed President Bush's plan to dramatically reduce the number of troops stationed around the globe, calling the realignment a potential threat to the nation's security.

"Nobody wants to bring the troops home more than those of us who have fought in foreign wars. But it needs to be done at the right time and in a sensible way," Kerry said in an address to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the same organization to whom Bush pitched his plan Monday to recall as many as 70,000 troops from Cold War-era bases in Europe and Asia.


John F. Kerry appears before veterans that President Bush addressed Monday. (David Kohl -- AP)

_____Kerry Speaks to VFW_____
John Kerry Video: Kerry criticizes Bush's proposal to recall up to 70,000 foreign troops.
Speech Text
spacer
2004 Campaign
___ Compare Bush and Kerry ___
spacer
Bush and Kerry Candidate Positions
A side-by-side comparison of the stands taken by President Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry.

___ More Election Coverage ___
spacer
Electoral College Map: Post analysis, polls and recent voting history from 16 swing states.
spacer
Live Discussions: Q&A With Post Reporters, Newsmakers and Pundits
spacer
News From the Trail: Updates and Analysis on Presidential, Senate and House Races




Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


_____Message Boards_____
Post Your Comments
_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• Politics News & Analysis
• Campaign Report
• Federal Insider
• News Alert

Further escalating the campaign battle over national security, Kerry said that it is particularly wrong-headed to pull a third of the U.S. ground troops from South Korea.

"Why are we unilaterally withdrawing 12,000 troops from the Korean Peninsula at the very time we are negotiating with North Korea -- a country that really has nuclear weapons? This is clearly the wrong signal to send at the wrong time," Kerry said.

Kerry maintained that the Bush proposal would also reduce forces at a time when the United States is battling al Qaeda in 60 countries. "Let's be clear -- the president's vaguely stated plan does not strengthen our hand in the war against terror," he said. "And in no way relieves the strain on our overextended military personnel. It doesn't even begin until 2006, and it takes 10 years to achieve. This hastily announced plan raises more doubts about our intentions and our commitments than it provides real answers."

In response, the Bush-Cheney campaign sent out a statement by retired Gen P.X. Kelley, former commandant of the Marine Corps, and it organized a teleconference with Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.), chairman of the Armed Services Committee, both of whom support the plan.

"John Kerry's opposition to troop realignment demonstrates a backward-looking view that blindly embraces the status quo and ignores the realities of the post-9/11 world," Kelley said. "The threat America faces today is fundamentally different than the threats America's military was configured to face during the Cold War."

Bush's troop realignment plan is part of a broad military shift that administration officials say will make U.S. forces more flexible at a time when national security threats are less predictable. Over the next decade, about a third of the 230,000 soldiers based overseas would return to bases at home, and massive military facilities in Germany and other allied nations would be downsized or closed. Smaller, lightly staffed bases and supply stations would be established in Eastern Europe. They could be used for rapid deployments to the Middle East or other trouble spots.

Kerry received his most enthusiastic response from 6,000 VFW members when he strongly advocated improving health care, disability and other benefits for veterans. But overall, he was received here far less enthusiastically than was Bush, who generated two standing ovations during his speech. By contrast, Kerry's audience offered cordial and polite applause, with one detractor heckling the Massachusetts senator.

Both campaigns are assertively courting the nation's 26 million veterans, a traditionally Republican constituency with which Democrats hope they can make gains because of Kerry's military record. The VFW has 2.6 million members.

After the speech, a number of veterans said that they believe the Democrat is promising far more than he could deliver. "John Kerry said exactly what veterans wanted to hear today," said Alan Hall, a Navy veteran of World War II and the Korean War. "But how is he going to pay for it all?"

Robert Belding, a Persian Gulf War veteran, said he boycotted the speech because Kerry's "promises don't reflect his Senate record. He says he supports troops, and then he votes against the $87 billion request to help them."

The comments of some veterans indicated that GOP efforts to paint Kerry's commitment to national security as new and politically expedient are resonating.

"I heard he missed 75 percent of his votes on the intelligence committee," said World War II veteran Gerald Kulligan, echoing the e-mails being sent out by the Bush campaign. "Who wants a president who works 25 percent of the time?"


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company