washingtonpost.com  > Business > Columnists > Cash Flow

Quick Quotes

Cash Flow

No Rest for the Bleary: New Tax Turns to Ponder

By Albert B. Crenshaw
The Washington Post
Sunday, October 31, 2004; Page F01

The giant American Jobs Creation Act, passed by Congress and signed by President Bush earlier this month, was stunningly complicated and aimed mostly at businesses, two characteristics that made it a MEGO (my eyes glaze over) for many Americans.

But ordinary taxpayers should be aware that the new law does contain a number of provisions that, for better or for worse, may affect them.

_____Investing Columns_____
Investing
Washington Investing
The Color of Money
Cash Flow
The Week in Stocks
Personal Finance Special Report
_____The Markets_____
Dow Over 12 Months
Nasdaq Over 12 Months
S&P 500 Over 12 Months
Add Cash Flow to your personal home page.

_____  Tax Center _____

Tax Changes Guarantee Surprises
Experts say those most likely to face an unpleasant shock are people in the income range of roughly $75,000 to $400,000.

Filed Your 1099 Form?
If you are a mutual fund investor, you may want to wait until the end of the month before filing your tax return.

Falling Into AMT Trouble
The AMT is expected to loom far larger this year, especially in the Washington region than in lower-tax, lower-cost areas of the country.

_____  Live Discussion _____

Transcript: Michelle Singletary and Sam Serio of the IRS


Special Report:
Find articles about the latest changes; advise about filing your taxes; and online forms and resources.


_____Business_____
Latest Business News
Check Your Portfolio

In some cases, individuals will reap benefits from provisions for businesses that will naturally flow to owners and workers. But many of the changes wrought by the bill are straightforward tax cuts and "loophole" closers aimed directly at individuals.

A few have broad reach, noted Lorin D. Luchs, partner in the national tax office of accounting firm BDO Seidman, but many affect people only in specific circumstances. But in both cases, the consequences can be important, so here's a quick look at some of the changes.

New Breaks

• Sales tax. Individuals will have a choice on their 2004 and 2005 tax returns of deducting either their state and local income taxes, as they have in the past, or their state and local sales taxes, which have been nondeductible since 1986.

The clearest winners from this change, of course, are residents of states with no income tax (Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington state and Wyoming). They get a deduction where there had been none, and their main decision is whether they should itemize if they normally take the standard deduction. If they are thinking of making a big purchase, such as a car or a boat, they may want to do some quick calculations about whether to buy this year or wait until January. The tax benefits could be better in one year or the other, depending on income and other possible deductions.

The bill allows taxpayers to choose between keeping track of the exact amount of tax they paid -- which means hanging onto receipts -- or using tables that are to be provided by the Treasury Department. The bill also allows taxpayers to use the table but add on the tax from a big-ticket item such as a car or a boat.

Residents of states with both income and sales taxes will generally see no benefit from this, since they will remain better off deducting their state and local income taxes. But some moderate-income taxpayers, especially in states with low income taxes and high sales taxes, should run the numbers both ways.

• Attorneys' fees. Current law requires that damage awards, other than for physical injury, be included in taxable income. Since many such cases involve "contingency" fees -- attorneys get a share of the award, but nothing if the case is lost -- the question arises as to whether money that goes straight to the lawyer should be included in the taxable income of the plaintiff. Courts have split on that, some saying, in effect, lawyers' fees aren't income to the plaintiffs since they never had a right to them, and others saying that the whole award is income and that the fees can then be deducted. This is a significant distinction, because the deduction is subject to all sorts of limitations and to the alternative minimum tax.

The bill resolves the issue in favor of the taxpayer in cases involving illegal discrimination under various civil rights or other laws. It specifies that in such cases the taxpayer is entitled to an "above the line" deduction, meaning the fee is subtracted directly from adjusted gross income and is not subject to the various limitations that can apply to itemized deductions.


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company