washingtonpost.com  > Columns > Bridge

BRIDGE Frank Stewart

By Frank Stewart
Sunday, April 24, 2005; Page D02

Neither side vulnerable


S 10 9

_____Bridge League_____
For information about duplicate bridge games and lessons in the Washington area, call Ben Laden at 202-244-1765 or go to www.washingtonbridgeleague.org.

H J 9 6 4 3

D A K J 10

C A 3


S K J 6 4

H Q 8

D Q 9 8 5 3 2



S Q 7 5 2

H A 10 7 5 2

D None

C 8 6 5 4


S A 8 3


D 7 6 4

C Q J 10 9 7 2

The bidding:
All Pass
Opening lead: Choose it

Finishing second in a major bridge event is like shooting 280 at the U.S. Open and losing to someone who shot 279: The winners played scarcely better.

In the Blue Ribbon Pairs at the ACBL's 2004 Fall Championships, Robert Levin and Steve Weinstein, East-West, produced the outstanding deal of that event. When North-South stopped at three clubs, Levin found the remarkable bid of three spades as East.

I advocate bids like this only for players capable of them. Since Levin had length in clubs and hearts, he inferred that Weinstein's hand was short in those suits, hence long in spades.

South should have doubled or tried 3NT, and when instead he went to four clubs, the defense made him regret it. Weinstein, on opening lead, judged that Levin had length in hearts and clubs, else how could he know West had spades? So Levin's hand was short in diamonds, and Weinstein therefore led the nine of diamonds.

South played dummy's ace (an error), and Levin ruffed and led a spade. If South ducked, West would win and give East another diamond ruff with the ace of hearts to come. South instead took the ace of spades, picked up the trumps and led a diamond to the 10, but he had no re-entry to his hand to repeat the finesse. He led a heart, but Levin took his ace, and the defense cashed two spades. Down one.

Weinstein-Levin were runners-up in this prestigious event. With more opportunities like this, they'd have won it all.

©2005, Tribune Media Services

© 2005 The Washington Post Company