washingtonpost.com  > Columns > Tina Brown

'Deep Throat': When Naughty Was Nice

By Tina Brown
Thursday, February 10, 2005; Page C01

It was probably appropriate that half the guests at a Manhattan screening of the new documentary "Inside Deep Throat" on Monday night thought they'd come to watch a movie about Watergate. The other half, of course, knew they were there to look back on the days when porn legend Linda Lovelace and her co-star Harry Reems were making oral history together.

What both those '70s melodramas, the political and the sexual, had in common was the brooding presence of Richard Nixon. Without his greenlighting of the Justice Department's prosecution of Reems and the rest of the perpetrators of 1972's "Deep Throat," the old skinflick would have long ago passed into oblivion. As it was, it became the most profitable movie ever made. Its $25,000 production cost yielded a more than $600 million payday -- roughly a million bucks for each $40 invested. The money was collected nightly by Mafia bagmen, their suitcases bulging with huge quantities of disappearing cash. "Deep Throat" had winner's luck for everyone but its creators.

_____Recent Columns_____
The Difference Between Faint and Fainthearted (The Washington Post, Feb 3, 2005)
Donald Trump, Settling Down (The Washington Post, Jan 27, 2005)
Mothering the Old Boys (The Washington Post, Jan 20, 2005)
Full Archive

"Inside Deep Throat" appears headed for success, too, albeit on a smaller scale and with HBO substituting for the mob. The current FCC fatwa against any kind of network naughtiness adds the touch of lefty moralism needed to give the new documentary a chic marketing angle. Plus there's a good red-state redemption story: Harry Reems, whose "Deep Throat" fame sputtered out in a booze- and drug-addled stupor that left him panhandling on Sunset Strip, is now a born-again Christian selling real estate in Park City, Utah. He was in attendance at Monday's screening. His acting skills were always wooden and his hair is nearly white, but he looked craggy and spry.

I have to admit that I'm pretty tired at this point of listening to some of the clapped-out sexual crusaders featured in the documentary -- guys like Hugh Hefner, who has spent the past 30 years sitting around in a dressing gown, holding forth on the importance of the liberties he bestowed on us all. Even so, it is worth seeing the documentary for its buoyant use of old footage, its hilarious interviews with some of the behind-the-camera schlemiels who actually made the original movie and its Plato's Retreat-like sense of the '70s. It was touching to see how the director of "Deep Throat," a former swinger and hair salon owner named Gerard Damiano, and his cast and crew had no idea they were on the cultural cutting edge until Nixon, Jack Nicholson and Warren Beatty told them they were.

As for the panel following the documentary, coming on the heels of the first anniversary of Nipplegate at the Super Bowl it afforded a snapshot of where we are stuck in the Bush 2 culture wars.

With film critic Elvis Mitchell moderating, the onstage chairs were occupied by feminist virago and porn scourge Catharine MacKinnon; media bloodhound and defense attorney Alan Dershowitz; hellcat publisher and former Bernie Kerik squeeze Judith Regan, who published Jenna Jameson's best-selling memoir; and New Yorker journalist Peter Boyer, who was there because he made a PBS "Frontline" report about the porn business. (In his sly southern drawl, Boyer reminded us that his film featured one Adam Glasser, a nice, polite Jewish boy with a doting mom, who made his fortune as a purveyor of anal porn under the name Seymore Butts and is now the Trump-like hero of his very own Showtime reality show, "Family Business.")

MacKinnon, whose tight white face and 19th-century hairdo made her look like Carry Nation on the South Beach diet, launched into a tirade about how "Inside Deep Throat" had failed to point out that Linda Lovelace had been a victim of "throat rape." (Lovelace couldn't tell us herself because she is dead. One of the weaknesses of the documentary is that the pathos of her story is largely ignored.) MacKinnon's "feminist fundamentalism" immediately came under fire from Dershowitz, who went on a stemwinder about how there is zero evidence of ill effects on society at large from pornography and how female sexual exploitation is no different from the exploitation of young black basketball players at school.

Regan's melodic baritone then seemed to back up MacKinnon, albeit in a mode that still allowed her to have it all ways. Every porn star she has encountered, she said, is a victim of sexual abuse. Jenna Jameson is a deeply sad woman. Her "issues" are still "unresolved." That's why Regan helped her tell her story and titled the book "How to Make Love Like a Porn Star: A Cautionary Tale." (Regan didn't buy MacKinnon's allegation, however, that Lovelace had to be hypnotized in order to perform her sexual feats. "I took voice training," Regan explained to me afterward. "I'm pretty sure it can be done.")

It all reminded me about the real source of nostalgia for that era: the comparatively dizzying level at which the cultural argument was conducted in those days. All that casual brilliance -- not Ann Coulter vs. Michael Moore but Norman Mailer vs. Gore Vidal. It must have been fun to turn on the TV back then. Mailer's big teddy bear head probably got that size by his appearing on a talk show as good as Dick Cavett's and knowing he was being listened to.

"What I remember from those times is a sense of exuberance and hope," Erica Jong, who is also featured in the movie, told me. "We didn't think it was a joke. We thought sexual freedom would bring world peace. We really thought that if people gave up their inhibitions, the world would change. We were wrong."

In the age of media excess there is no room for that kind of innocent earnestness. Cable culture drains all conviction with the need to pound any idea into an available niche. After the panel was over, half the women secretly found themselves agreeing more with MacKinnon than with either Dershowitz or the movie. They wouldn't be caught dead saying so out loud, of course, for fear of being cast as a retro feminist or, worse, the kind of popeyed theocon who wages war on SpongeBob SquarePants. That would be almost as uncool as admitting how much more sophisticated and entertaining the Super Bowl ads were under the FCC's regrettable new strictures to keep it clean.

© 2005, Tina Brown


© 2005 The Washington Post Company