washingtonpost.com  > Politics > Elections > 2004 Election

'Soft' Voters to Question Candidates at Second Presidential Debate

Town Hall Session To Give Voice to The Uncommitted

By Peter Slevin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 8, 2004; Page A08

ST. LOUIS, Oct. 7 -- After choosing between flank steak and chicken with prosciutto, the citizen-questioners will take their seats on the risers surrounding the stage and the tall swivel chairs that President Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry will occupy soon. They will have a chance to practice speaking into a microphone, but only the moderator will know what they would ask if given the chance.

Secrecy about the questions is one essential rule among many for what is expected to be the least predictable of the three presidential debates. Rather than a journalist designing questions, Friday night's town hall session will be turned over to the worries and musings of prospective voters.

___ Debate Coverage ___

Full Debate Video:
The final presidential debate, held at Arizona State University in Tempe, Ariz.
Complete Debate Transcript

_____Analysis_____

Debate Referee:
The Washington Post and washingtonpost.com examine the accuracy of the claims and charges leveled in the final presidential debate by President Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry.

_____Thursday Discussions_____

Transcript: Post Associate Editor Robert G. Kaiser analyzes the third presidential debate.
Transcript: PBS "Washington Week" host and moderator of the vice presidential debate Gwen Ifill.
Transcript: washingtonpost.com's Chief Political Correspondent Terry M. Neal on the latest election news.

_____Latest News_____

Full Coverage of Debates
Latest Blogs on the Debate

spacer
2004 Campaign

President Bush Photos: Bush Wins
President Bush claims victory after John F. Kerry concedes the 2004 presidential election.
Bush's Speech: Video | Transcript
Kerry's Speech: Video | Transcript
Video: 2004 Election Rewind

___ Election Results ___

Exit Polls by State:

 

Results by Zip Code:
 

Results by State:

 


50 State Election Roundup
Comparison of 2004 and 2000
Amendments Defining Marriage


___ Electee Profiles ___

The New House
Freshman Senators
New Governors


 U.S. President
Updated 2:09 AM ET Precincts:0%
 CandidateVotes % 
  Bush * (R)  60,693,28151% 
  Kerry (D)  57,355,97848% 
  Other  1,107,3931% 
Full ResultsSourceAP



Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


_____Message Boards_____
Post Your Comments

The 100 to 150 participants were chosen by the Gallup polling organization. They may have opinions about the candidates. They may be leaning to one candidate or the other. But they must also have told a Gallup representative that they might still vote for the other guy. The campaigns call them "soft" supporters.

"We call them uncommitted voters," said Frank Newport, editor in chief of the Gallup Poll.

Gallup had sole discretion to choose the participants from a random sample in the St. Louis area. Working the telephone, the organization asked people whether they were registered voters, whether they planned to vote and whether they were committed to a candidate.

If they were undecided, they qualified, but "those are few and far between," Newport said in an interview. He pointed out that the most recent Gallup poll, published this week, showed zero percent of American voters undecided, the first time anyone can remember that happening.

If the Missourians answered that they favored one candidate, Newport said, they were then asked whether there was any chance they would vote for a different candidate. If they said there was a chance, Newport said, they were told they could join the town hall pool.

"Most of them," Newport said, "are very excited about doing it."

Preparations for the 90-minute session have been underway for months at Washington University in St. Louis, which was host for debates in two previous presidential years. The last piece of carpeting was laid and the final non-verbal nails were pounded in the school gymnasium Thursday as the campaigns and hundreds of journalists and technicians poured into town.

Just as the political protagonists were polishing their performances, the aspiring questioners were asked to do the same. Participants were invited to think up a question and be prepared to read it if the moderator, ABC anchor Charles Gibson, called on them.

"We just recruit the people," Newport said. "We have no idea what's the question they are interested in asking. The Commission on Presidential Debates has no idea, and neither do the campaigns."

Rules established during hard bargaining by the campaigns made it so. The 32-page agreement specifies that "the number of 'soft' Bush supporters shall equal the number of 'soft' Kerry supporters." It requires Gibson to choose an equal number of questions from each group and to make sure that he evenly divides the questions between two subject fields: the economy and domestic policy; and foreign policy and homeland security.

Only questions submitted to Gibson in advance will be permitted. There will be no follow-ups. In fact, the questioner's microphone will go dead once the question has been asked. Deviations will not be allowed.

Gibson has instructions to cut off a questioner who "poses a question or makes a statement that is in any material way different" from the original question. He will tell the audience that "non-reviewed questions" are banned.

The rules specify that Bush and Kerry will have "swivel chairs that can be locked in place." They will be the same height, and they will have backs and footrests. Each candidate will have a nearby table for water and writing.

Unlike in the other debates, the candidates may leave their chairs and carry their choice of a wireless hand-held or lapel microphone.

They may walk in their marked portion of the stage, according to the agreement. It states that "the predesignated areas of the candidates may not overlap."

Washington University is working to smooth the experience of the prospective questioners. The soft voters will assemble for a late lunch at a hotel and then dinner on campus. They will be asked to commit to steak or chicken, but may change their minds and choose other food from the buffet without losing their dining privileges. Gibson will not have a say in the matter.


© 2004 The Washington Post Company