washingtonpost.com  > Nation > National Security > Foreign Policy
Correction to This Article
An Oct. 8 article on congressional action to reorganize the nation's intelligence operations incorrectly reported a House roll-call vote rejecting a bill similar to one approved by the Senate. The vote against the proposal was 213 to 203, not 280 to 141.
Page 2 of 2  < Back  

House Passes Corporate Tax Bill

On the House floor last night, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas (R-Calif.) described Bowles's Republican opponent, Rep. Richard Burr (N.C.), as one of the chief architects of the tobacco buyout provisions.

Taking the floor, Burr then called it "a special night" for tobacco farmers and said: "This piece of legislation will probably enable 10,000 individuals in North Carolina alone" to avoid having "to file for bankruptcy this year."


Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


Other parts of the bill were clearly crafted with an eye to the coming election. Republicans, for example, would like to take credit for helping middle-class voters in seven states that do not have a state income tax. The bill would restore a provision of the tax code that allows the deduction of state sales taxes in lieu of deducting state income taxes.

Meanwhile, Democrats charged that the bill is far too generous to big companies. "It's Christmas in October for multinational companies and lobbyists with friends in high places," said Charles B. Rangel (N.Y.), ranking Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee.

Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said the bill "only serves to complicate and carve up the tax code. . . . It continues [on] the path of extraordinary fiscal irresponsibility."

From modest beginnings, the tax bill grew steadily.

The original impetus was a World Trade Organization ruling nearly two years ago that declared $5 billion in annual U.S. export subsidies to U.S. manufacturers to be illegal.

That ruling prompted the European Union to impose retaliatory tariffs on 1,600 U.S. manufactured products and farm goods. The tariffs, now at 12 percent, rise each month the illegal export subsidies continue.

The bill would phase out the export subsidies deemed illegal by the WTO. But it is still unclear whether this would take place fast enough to satisfy the Europeans and result in the lifting of the tariffs.


< Back  1 2

© 2004 The Washington Post Company