washingtonpost.com  > Metro > Religion > On Faith

More Voices: Gender and the Bible

Friday, April 1, 2005; 5:02 PM

Do you approve of gender-neutral translations of the Bible?

I do not approve. Leave the way the Bible is written alone.

— Pam Hunter, Silver Spring

_____On Faith_____
The Business of Filling Pews (The Washington Post, Mar 6, 2005)
Should Breakaway Congregations Be Allowed to Keep Church Property? (The Washington Post, Mar 6, 2005)
REVELATIONS (The Washington Post, Mar 6, 2005)
Previous Issues

As a Reform Jew I am exceptionally comfortable with inclusive language in our prayer books. The language we use increasingly moves away from the idea that God is of any gender or of any particular "type." Thus, we now refer to God as "God" or by "God's" Hebrew name, not as a man. Further, we tend to avoid referring to "Lord," which suggests a male or paternal concept.

— Samuel A. Simon, McLean

Absolutely -- at the time the Bible was written (many years after the actual events I might add) -- language was used differently. Today, language is inclusive because our culture is inclusive. Just as the language reflected the culture of its day back then, so should the language reflect the culture of today.

— Cecilia Lammers, Mitchellville

No!!! If you allow gender-neutral changes -- not translations -- what's next? Changing references to God from "Him" to "It"?

— Rom Escanilla, Clinton

No, I don't approve. Gender-neutral language was obviously not a concern of the Bible's authors. They wrote as they thought and talked back then. Personally, I think that's the way it should stay. Honestly, if one reads the Bible and considers and accepts what the customs of the times were, I don't see why there's a problem. It's the way it was. It seems the whole gender-neutral thing is all for the sake of being politically correct, and, in my opinion, it looks like some "men" have too much time on their hands.

— Joseph Snyder, Alexandria

I oppose gender-neutral Bibles on the grounds that the debate is a meaningless distraction from what Christians should be paying attention to. The book is a guide to living your life, not a political football to be tossed about. "Sons" vs. "children" should join "thou" vs. "you" and "sins" vs. "trespasses" in the list of meaningless religious debates that have nothing to do with living a Christian life. How could any female Christian reasonably believe that God looks less favorably upon her simply because of her gender?

— Larry Akiyama, Alexandria

As Catholics, my wife and I have noticed that Bible verses and songs have changed. While she seems to support the idea, I do not. If you truly believe in the message of the Bible then you will understand that the use of the masculine pronoun is not a slight. If one feels God doesn't love them because the Bible doesn't say "woman," they should re-examine their faith and not Biblical grammar.

The writers of scripture lived in a time when that was done, so we should not change, if only to help remember the world in which Christ lived.


CONTINUED    1 2 3    Next >

© 2005 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive