Judy Robinson, who led the charter-change effort in 1992 to limit the county executive and council to two successive four-year terms, said yesterday that she was not surprised to learn that developers were footing the bill to help Hendershot stay on the council.
Robinson said real estate interests spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to oppose the 1992 effort.
Developer Patrick Ricker gave $15,000 to ACORN.
_____Metrorail Special Report_____
Urgency Drives New Metro Pitch For Funds (The Washington Post, Aug 20, 2004)
Derailed Train In Silver Spring Slows Red Line (The Washington Post, Aug 20, 2004)
Metro Plans 'Brush-Up' Training in Courtesy (The Washington Post, Aug 19, 2004)
Bus Service to Expand, Shift (The Washington Post, Aug 19, 2004)
In the Lofts of Luxury (The Washington Post, Aug 14, 2004)
More Metrorail News
Discussion: Transportation Costs
"This is the way the development community has worked in this county," Robinson said. "They don't have the guts to come out front to say we want to remove the term limits. They are behind the scenes, and that's the reason why we pushed for term limits to begin with, because of their influence over the process. "
ACORN submitted a petition this week to get the charter amendment on the November ballot. The County Council, meanwhile, will decide Friday whether to place two charter amendments of its own on the ballot, both designed to negate the objectives of ACORN and the builders. One would make Hendershot ineligible to run for an at-large seat; the other would retain the council's power to select a chairman.
In Montgomery County yesterday, the County Council agreed to put three proposed charter amendments on the November ballot -- but not before taking steps to reduce their chances of approval.
The council approved two measures from Robin Ficker, a Republican anti-tax advocate, that would establish term limits and eliminate the council's ability to override a property tax cap. It provisionally approved a proposal from the Montgomery County Civic Federation to do away with at-large council positions, pending submission of signatures by a deadline early next month.
Dan Wilhelm, president of the federation, said yesterday that the group had gathered more than the required 10,000 signatures and would turn them in by the weekend.
The council also changed two of the amendment summaries that will appear on the ballot, a move some members said will clarify the effect of the measures.
The move alters the language presented to voters without changing the effect of the amendments if they pass. But proponents said the changes are unfair and possibly illegal.
"I'm disappointed that they felt they had to resort to these shenanigans," said Dale Tibbitts, chair of the electoral reform task force of the federation, which is petitioning to do away with at-large seats and create nine districts. "They are trying to make it so confusing that folks will vote against it."
Ficker said he will consider challenging the changes in court.
Some council members agreed that the language changes amounted to editorializing on the ballot.
"This feels more like advocacy than just presenting the facts," said council member Tom Perez (D-Silver Spring). "I think we can defeat [a proposed charter amendment] on the merits."
The council also decided not to place on the ballot two measures recommended by the Charter Review Commission. The first would have defined council members as full-time employees, paving the way for a possible raise. The second was a largely technical amendment affecting the veto process.
Silverman said the council will join with County Executive Douglas M. Duncan (D), who also opposes the three amendments headed for the ballot, to build a coalition to defeat the measures. Eliminating the two other issues will make it easier to communicate to voters in November, he said.
"The message should be clear: 'Just say no,' " he said.