washingtonpost.com  > World > Middle East > The Gulf > Saudi Arabia

U.S. Says Saudis Repress Religion

8 Countries Named In Annual Report

By Glenn Kessler and Alan Cooperman
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, September 16, 2004; Page A01

The United States for the first time named Saudi Arabia yesterday as a country that severely violates religious freedom, potentially subjecting the close U.S. ally to sanctions.

"Freedom of religion does not exist" in Saudi Arabia, the State Department said in its annual report on international religious freedom. "Freedom of religion is not recognized or protected under the country's laws and basic religious freedoms are denied to all but those who adhere to the state-sanctioned version of Sunni Islam," the report said, adding that "non-Muslim worshippers risk arrest, imprisonment, lashing, deportation and sometimes torture."

_____Religion News_____
Displays of Perseverance (The Washington Post, Sep 25, 2004)
A Mission To Salvage Holy Message (The Washington Post, Sep 24, 2004)
An Array of Takes on Thomas (The Washington Post, Sep 18, 2004)
Va. Episcopalians Enlist Ex-Archbishop's Services (The Washington Post, Sep 16, 2004)
A Rabbi's Unorthodox Revival (The Washington Post, Sep 15, 2004)
More Religion Stories
_____Message Boards_____
Post Your Comments

The United States also identified seven other nations as "countries of particular concern": Burma, China, Iran, North Korea and Sudan, which were on the State Department's list of concern last year, and Eritrea and Vietnam, which were added this year. Iraq was dropped.

Admonishing Saudi Arabia was a switch for the administration, which had resisted calls from human rights groups and key lawmakers that the State Department cite the desert kingdom, a key oil supplier and partner in the war against terrorism, in its annual report. U.S. officials have said they preferred to handle such concerns privately even as they acknowledged that for all practical purposes Saudi Arabia has one of the world's most repressive regimes.

The designation of Saudi Arabia was made as the Bush administration has come under sharp attack from Democrats -- and the hit movie "Fahrenheit 9/11" -- for its close relationship with Saudi rulers.

Democratic presidential nominee John F. Kerry took the unusual step of singling out the Saudi royal family during his acceptance speech at the Democratic convention, saying, "I want an America that relies on its own ingenuity and innovation -- not the Saudi royal family."

Last night, a senior adviser to the campaign, Susan Rice, said Kerry supported yesterday's decision, but she accused the administration of taking a "kid glove" approach to Saudi Arabia. "President Bush's record makes clear: The only time he will acknowledge unacceptable Saudi behavior is within weeks of an election," she said.

But administration officials denied that the long-debated action was taken for political considerations.

"Never one word of that has been spoken to me by anybody," said John V. Hanford III, ambassador at large for international religious freedom. "We are not trying to counter allegations that have no basis in fact."

Hanford said that in the past year the State Department has tried to prod the Saudi government to make changes in how it deals with religious freedom, and that there had been encouraging signs that the leadership had promoted tolerance and moderation and was seeking to remove inflammatory statements from textbooks. But he said the Saudi actions were not enough to "put them back over the threshold."

Much of the discrimination in Saudi Arabia, Hanford said, was directed at other Muslims who do not practice Wahhabi, the state-sanctioned religion, in particular Shiites. "Most branches of Islam do not have freedom of religion in Saudi Arabia," he said.

The Saudi Embassy declined to comment on the administration's action.

U.S. officials yesterday declined to say what, if any, sanctions might be contemplated against Saudi Arabia if it does not improve religious freedom. "I'm not going to start speculating at this point on what might happen next," State Department spokesman Richard A. Boucher told reporters. "We will be following along, considering the appropriate measures as required."

Alexandra Arriaga, director of government relations for Amnesty International USA, said the designation should have been made "quite some time ago" but what is needed now is concentrated follow-up by the U.S. government. Bush "ought to raise this issue more forcefully," Arriaga said, such as setting benchmarks for the Saudi government, including lifting restrictions on religious minorities in Saudi law.


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company