washingtonpost.com  > Nation > National Security > Intelligence

Many Are Cool to Intelligence Plan

Bush Expresses Reservations; Tenet Says GOP Senate Proposal Would 'Gut the CIA'

By Dan Eggen and Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, August 24, 2004; Page A03

A far-reaching proposal by Senate Republicans to dismantle the CIA and remove key intelligence agencies from the Pentagon ran into heavy political opposition yesterday, not only from key members of Congress but also from longtime former CIA director George J. Tenet.

President Bush also responded coolly to the proposal by Sen. Pat Roberts (Kan.) and seven other GOP members of the Senate intelligence committee. Bush said that "we're looking at all options" but cautioned he would oppose any proposal that would create a new layer of bureaucracy in the president's national security team.


Sen. Pat Roberts, left, surprised Sen. Carl M. Levin and others by announcing on TV a Senate GOP intelligence plan. (Karin Cooper -- CBS via AP)


Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


spacer
___ Intelligence News ___


spacer
spacer
___ The Intel Debate ___

_____Message Boards_____
Post Your Comments
_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• News Headlines
• News Alert

Bush did indicate that he would consider giving a new national intelligence director authority over the intelligence budget, which Roberts and the Sept. 11, 2001, commission have advocated.

"We'll take a look at it, determine, you know, whether or not it works or not," Bush told reporters in Crawford, Tex. "But there's going to be a lot of other ideas, too, as this debate goes forward."

The reaction of Tenet, who stepped down as CIA director in July, was much more critical. He released a statement saying Roberts's proposal would "gut the CIA" and reflects "a dangerous misunderstanding of the business of intelligence."

"Senator Roberts' proposal is yet another episode in the mad rush to rearrange wiring diagrams in an attempt to be seen as doing something," Tenet said. "It is time for someone to slam the brakes on before the politics of the moment drives the security of the American people off a cliff."

The skeptical reactions were based not only on the substance of the plan -- which calls for more sweeping changes than any other proposal for intelligence reform this year -- but also on anger over the way it was unveiled. Roberts disclosed the proposal during a television appearance on Sunday, and Democrats and some Republicans complained yesterday that they were not warned. Roberts released the text of the 139-page bill yesterday.

The generally negative reception contrasted sharply with the response to the recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission, whose best-selling report last month prompted almost immediate vows of reform from Bush and lawmakers in both parties.

The only Republican on the Senate intelligence committee who has not embraced Roberts's plan is Sen. John W. Warner (Va.), who chairs the Armed Services Committee. His office issued a statement yesterday saying Warner "has not been briefed on this proposal, but would have concerns about any plan that would transfer critical, well-functioning intelligence assets away from the Department of Defense during wartime."

The committee's ranking Democrat, Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (W.Va.), complained in a statement that "Senator Roberts did not afford me or any Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee an opportunity to work with him in drafting the proposal." He also said the plan "departs significantly from the Sept. 11 Commission's blueprint for reform."

"Having not seen the details of the Roberts proposal, my reaction is that disbanding and scattering the Central Intelligence Agency at such a crucial time would be a severe mistake," the statement said.

Roberts seemed surprised by the fervor of the criticism, and vigorously defended his bill in an hour-long session with reporters in his Senate office. Although he said he is open to modifying the details, he maintained that his plan offers the best way to implement the goals of the Sept. 11 commission. The panel offered 41 recommendations for reform in its report, including naming a national intelligence director who would work out of the White House.

Under his plan, Roberts said, the CIA would cease to exist by name, but every CIA employee would continue working in his or her current capacity. "We are not terminating the CIA -- we are making it more powerful," he said.

Roberts also said that by creating a highly influential national intelligence director (NID) with budgetary and personnel authority over virtually all the government's intelligence operations, his bill would make efforts in that area more coordinated and focused.


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company