washingtonpost.com  > Technology > Tech Policy > E-Politics

Quick Quotes

E-Voting Group Sues Maryland Elections Board

By Robert MacMillan
washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 12, 2004; 5:54 PM

A Maryland group seeking paper trails on touch-screen voting machines today sued the State Board of Elections to win the right to monitor polling places on Election Day.

The lawsuit, filed at the U.S. District Court in Baltimore, also seeks the right for TrueVoteMD members to warn voters about possible problems with touch-screen voting machines while standing within 100 feet of Maryland polling places, traditionally a forbidden zone for candidates, campaigns and other groups.

Click for E-voting Main Page Latest E-Voting Developments
D.C. Area Avoids E-Voting Misery
Md. Critics Document Handful Of Glitches
Va. Election Officials Say Machines Generally Perform Well
Transcript: Chat With post.com reporter Robert MacMillan
Transcript: Chat With Post Reporter Dan Keating
E-Voting Special Report: Videos,
     Interactive Map

'A Massive Experiment' in Voting
Conspiracy Theorists Fan Flames
Ohio Firm Finds Itself in Crosshairs
Exhibit Stuffed With Voting History
Local Elections Have Colorful Past

_____Related Coverage_____
Problems Abound in Election System (The Washington Post, Sep 5, 2004)
Judge Rules in Favor Of Md. Vote Machines (The Washington Post, Sep 2, 2004)
Lost Votes in N.M. a Cautionary Tale (The Washington Post, Aug 22, 2004)
Maryland Activists Want E-Voting Receipts (washingtonpost.com, Jul 19, 2004)
___Tech Policy/Security E-letter___
Written by washingtonpost.com's tech policy team, the e-mail version of this weekly feature includes an original news article and links to policy and cyber-security stories from the previous week.
Click Here for Free Sign-up
Read E-letter Archive


TrueVoteMD co-founder Linda Schade, a Takoma Park resident, said the group will "invite people to fill out a complaint form" if they report problems with the machines. TrueVoteMD is considering whether to file legal challenges to Maryland's election results if any voter complaints arise on Election Day.

Linda Lamone, the state's elections administrator, said allowing the group's members to talk to voters in that zone "would be improper."

"We felt that allowing them to do that would just create chaos and intimidate the voters," Lamone said.

Schade said that "We are not trying to influence how anyone votes. We are there to document the problems that voters experience."

She said TrueVoteMD received permission from the state attorney general's office on Oct. 5 to place hundreds of poll watchers inside voting locations throughout the state on Election Day. Poll watchers normally are limited to campaign representatives or groups that have issues on the ballots that day, but the attorney general's office made an exception to avoid litigation, said Assistant Attorney General Judith A. Armold.

The office revoked the agreement after discovering that TrueVoteMD members and volunteers planned to sue for the right to gather within 100 feet of the polling places to speak out against touch-screen voting.

Schade said exit pollers are allowed to talk to voters in that space, and that the law only forbids "campaigning and electioneering."

Armold declined to comment on other groups that would be allowed in that area. "We've always taken a very strict position on what can be done within the 100-foot zone," she said. "Even though it may not be electioneering for a particular person, [it] is not allowed within a 100-foot zone."


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 TechNews.com