Mergers Raise Concerns Over Internet Access
Wednesday, February 16, 2005; Page E01
On the surface, the frenzy of telecommunications mergers in the past few weeks raises relatively clear-cut questions for lawmakers and regulators who will be weighing the deals: Will consumers and businesses be harmed if long-distance choices disappear when AT&T and MCI are swallowed by telephone giants SBC and Verizon?
|
So far, there is no organized group calling for the rejection of Verizon Communications Inc.'s buyout of MCI Inc. or SBC Communications Inc.'s purchase of AT&T Corp. Instead, in a process that could last a year or more, several organizations said they will press regulators to place conditions on the mergers to help ensure robust Internet competition.
For many consumers, wireless service is a substitute for traditional local and long-distance phone service. Under the administration of outgoing FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell, phone line discounts were eliminated, making it difficult for companies such as MCI, AT&T and smaller players to offer local service over local phone company lines.
Meanwhile, the local phone giants were allowed to enter the long-distance market. Together, these government moves caused the MCIs and AT&Ts of the world to begin withdrawing from serving residential customers. As a result, experts said, regulators would be hard-pressed to reject mergers that eliminated local phone service competitors that already had decided to leave the market because of government policies.
But MCI and AT&T are major providers of "Internet backbone," the large pipes that carry data around the world in the same way that interstate highways are the arteries for long-distance car traffic.
