washingtonpost.com  > Business > Columnists > Shaping the City
Shaping the City

Saarinen Developed a New Architectural Vocabulary for Each of His Projects

By Roger K. Lewis
Saturday, September 18, 2004; Page F03

You probably know what the main terminal building at Dulles International Airport looks like. You also may know that the Dulles terminal is among America's best-known works of architecture, designed in the 1950s by Eero Saarinen, son of acclaimed Finnish architect Eliel Saarinen.

But what you may not know is that Eero Saarinen, unlike many notable modern architects, did not develop nor relentlessly advocate a singular, formulaic, personal style. Saarinen's buildings do not look alike.

_____Real Estate Columns_____
The Nation's Housing
Housing Counsel
Shaping the City
From the Ground Up

You can readily identify the signature work of American architects Richard Meier or Frank Gehry, Spanish architect and engineer Santiago Calatrava, Japanese architect Tadao Ando or Iraq-born British architect Zaha Hadid. Each of these designers has a way of composing building geometry, structure and space, typically with a preferred palette of materials, details and colors. By repeating or slightly varying memorable elements, they create instantly recognizable projects, no matter what or where the project is.

By contrast, Saarinen stands separately partly because of his commitment to treating each project differently. He believed that objectively definable project circumstances -- site, climate, functional needs, cultural context, client characteristics, technological and economic resources -- required original thinking. He consciously resisted the prevailing dogma of 20th century modernism and the International Style, the belief in promulgating a universal architectural language.

Although Saarinen was always interested in innovative structural systems and materials, his work is diverse in its compositional and structural approach and in its expressive, metaphoric allusions. He could be simultaneously rational and romantic.

For his first large commission after World War II, the General Motors Technical Center outside Detroit, he created a campus of contrasting structures grouped around an artificial lake: rectilinear, low-rise research buildings; a dome-roofed assembly building; and a tall water tower standing in the lake. He clad the research buildings with glass and metal curtain walls, adopting for the first time neoprene glazing gaskets similar to those used for automobile windshields.

In his view, this was the logical, appropriately expressive architectural vocabulary for a research facility belonging to an industrial corporation whose assembly lines manufactured streamlined products.

Saarinen's designs for other corporate facilities -- John Deere, IBM, Bell Laboratories, CBS -- continued using evolving curtain wall technologies. But in each case, he explored new compositional tactics, details and finishes -- such as permanently rusted rather than painted or galvanized steel -- for making building skins with metal and glass.

Metal and glass curtain walls became the signature hallmarks not of Saarinen, but rather of his well-known contemporaries, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Philip Johnson and Skidmore Owings & Merrill.

At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the 1950s, Saarinen designed Kresge Auditorium, considered a structural tour de force not because of its skin, but because of its roof, an ultra-thin, spherical concrete shell resting on only three points. Standing a few dozen yards away from the auditorium is the structurally simple but spatially lyrical MIT Chapel, a flat-roofed, skylit cylinder faced with red brick and surrounded by a shallow, circular moat. Saarinen's chapel is a counterpoint to the larger auditorium dome.

CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company