Sign Up: Free Daily Tech E-letter  
Technology Home
Tech Policy
Government IT
Personal Tech
Special Reports
   -Venture Capital
   -Tech Layoffs
   -Tech Thursday

Page 2 of 2    < Back   

New Exchange Aims a Kick at Public Radio


E-Mail This Article
Print This Article

"Of course, we'd prefer more paying members," says Shapiro. "We aim to become self-sustainable in three to five years."

PRX is supported by grants from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the MacArthur Foundation, the National Endowment for the Arts, the Commerce Department and other organizations, as well as by membership fees. These trickle down as royalties to producers whose pieces are selected for broadcast. PRX reports that it paid $10,000 in license royalties during its first two quarters, ranging from $5.60 (for a commentary licensed by only one or a few stations) to $720 (for a frequently requested series on election primaries).

In theory, one could become a PRX addict and spend days and nights glued to the computer, listening to pieces conveniently sorted by length (1 minute to 90 minutes), category (commentaries, news analyses, soft feature, hard feature, documentary, "interstitial" or filler and more), author, date and timeliness -- and listen to them all without interruption. (Just imagine public radio purged of traffic reports, station and product identifications, pledge solicitations and commercials disguised as "enhanced funding announcements.")

PRX listeners also can submit reviews, either by writing one or by clicking on the Web site's drop-down lists of 40 options, to indicate, for example: "This radio piece was 'contemplative/encouraging/inspirational' " or "dark/edgy/opinionated" or even "informational/NPRNewsMagazine-y/Fresh Air-ish." More than 1,100 reviews are now available.

PRX discourages "slamming" of pieces listed and offers would-be reviewers the old bromide, "If you don't have anything nice to say . . ." But this may change, Shapiro says.

"It's been the subject of a lot of debate. Open peer review has never existed in public radio before, so at first we [and producers] were worried about attracting a lot of tough comments. Perhaps the first reviews were overly complimentary -- but now we're seeing a shift to a wider range of perspectives. And that's useful because for stations to find good pieces, they really need to have honest reviews."

Only a handful of PRX listings have been acquired by major radio network shows. No matter, says Shapiro, for PRX sees its primary role less as a network feeder than as a matchmaker between producers, listeners and public radio stations. In this capacity PRX seems to be working: In the first three months of this year, about 40 stations licensed 155 pieces -- about 55 hours of broadcasting -- from the Web site. And its membership continues to grow.

The advent of the Public Radio Exchange raises a larger question: Will Internet audio supplant the talking box -- or will it help radio survive in the cyber age?

But can old-fashioned radio ever really be replaced by the experience of curling up in bed and listening to . . . a computer?

< Back    1 2
Print This Article Home

© 2004 The Washington Post Company

Company Postings: Quick Quotes | Tech Almanac
About | Advertising | Contact | Privacy
My Profile | Rights & Permissions | Subscribe to print edition | Syndication