washingtonpost.com  > World > Middle East > The Gulf > Iraq > Abu Ghraib Prison
The Military

In Iraq's Guerrilla War, Army Intelligence Faces a Tough Job

By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 26, 2004; Page A18

The latest Pentagon report on the detainee abuse scandal focuses on the role played by military intelligence, which arguably is the branch of the Army most challenged by the insurgency in Iraq.

"MI," as the branch is called inside the Army, generally does not sneak around foreign capitals or conduct other cinematic forms of CIA-style espionage. Its job is the less exotic -- but increasingly difficult -- mission of assessing the capabilities and intentions of the enemy.

__ ABU GHRAIB PROBE __
spacer
Two previous reports were issued on abuses in Iraq. One finds fault at the highest levels of the Pentagon, and a second focuses on military intelligence.
spacer
Army Report | Key Findings
Report on DoD | Highlights
Video: Schlesinger on Findings
spacer
Exclusive Video: Video excerpt obtained by The Washington Post and edited for posting depicts prison abuse.
Exclusive Photos: Abu Ghraib
More Prison Photos
Chronology of Abu Ghraib
Prison Abuse Details
spacer
Documents: Official sworn statements from Iraqi detainees in Abu Ghraib describe their experiences.
U.S. Army Investigation Report
Transcript: Post Executive Editor

_____More From The Post_____
A Failure in Leadership, All the Way Up the Ranks (The Washington Post, Aug 26, 2004)
Abuse Report Widens Scope of Culpability (The Washington Post, Aug 26, 2004)
A Chronicle of Abuse (The Washington Post, Aug 26, 2004)
Incidents Grew in Severity, Report Says (The Washington Post, Aug 26, 2004)
Local Soldier Has Charges Reduced (The Washington Post, Aug 26, 2004)
6 Employees From CACI International, Titan Referred for Prosecution (The Washington Post, Aug 26, 2004)
Scandal Forces Interrogators to Explain Methods (The Washington Post, Aug 26, 2004)
Agency Is Faulted On Practices in Iraq, Secrecy Amid Probe (The Washington Post, Aug 26, 2004)
___ Postwar Iraq ___

_____ Request for Photos_____

Duty In Iraq
We want to give you the opportunity to show firsthand what it is like to live and work in Iraq.


_____ Latest News _____
spacer
More Coverage
spacer
_____ U.S. Military Deaths _____

Faces of the Fallen
Portraits of U.S. service members who have died in Iraq since the beginning of the war.


_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• News Headlines
• News Alert

In a conventional war, that means counting tanks and divisions, gauging how they are being used tactically, and perhaps guessing at what they might be used to do next.

But in a guerrilla war of the sort the U.S. military is fighting in Iraq, the task is far tougher. The enemy is more elusive. Its numbers matter less than in conventional warfare, although a foe's tactics and weaponry remain an important area of study, especially as insurgents continue probing to find U.S. military vulnerabilities. In Iraq, for instance, the enemy went from direct attacks in the spring of 2003 to lower-profile but deadly approaches such as roadside bombings.

Although the forces supporting rebel Shiite Muslim cleric Moqtada Sadr are fairly visible, said Andrew Bacevich, a retired Army colonel who teaches international relations at Boston University, much less is known about the size, organization or origin of the fighters in the Sunni Muslim part of the country. "We really don't know who the enemy is in the non-Shiite insurgency, or what their aim is, besides forcing the Americans to depart," he said.

Indeed, it was that pressing need to learn more about the insurgency that led Army Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, the U.S. commander on the ground in Iraq then, to push military intelligence officers last summer to make their interrogations more productive. Much of that work went on inside Abu Ghraib prison, where the number of detainees jumped suddenly. Teams of interrogators and translators working under the 205th Military Intelligence Brigade were responsible for extracting information from those prisoners that battlefield commanders could use to thwart attacks and save U.S. troops' lives.

"He was faced with having to develop intelligence so that he could determine why the attacks were occurring, where they were going to occur next and what he could do about it," said Army Gen. Paul J. Kern, who oversaw the report released yesterday. "He put a lot of pressure on his people to get that intelligence."


© 2004 The Washington Post Company