washingtonpost.com  > Politics > Elections > 2004 Election
Page 3 of 3  < Back  

Disband of Brothers

"Why are they there? Well they're there for the dignity of serving the country, and they're doing the right thing," he says.

That's the "honor of service," he says. It makes it possible for people to accept the sacrifices involved.


Vietnam veterans opposed to John Kerry demonstrate outside the Fleet Center in Boston during last month's Democratic National Convention. (Rick Bowmer -- AP)

spacer
2004 Campaign
___ Compare Bush and Kerry ___
spacer
Bush and Kerry Candidate Positions
A side-by-side comparison of the stands taken by President Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry.

___ More Election Coverage ___
spacer
Electoral College Map: Post analysis, polls and recent voting history from 16 swing states.
spacer
Live Discussions: Q&A With Post Reporters, Newsmakers and Pundits
spacer
News From the Trail: Updates and Analysis on Presidential, Senate and House Races




Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• Politics News & Analysis
• Campaign Report
• Federal Insider
• News Alert

But the moment of dishonor occurred in 1971. So why now?

"We're talking about commander in chief of the United States," he says of Kerry's presidential ambition.

The Swifties want him stopped.

Separate it from the presidential campaign, though, and the dispute over honor in the military is nothing new.

"Catfights over military service are as old as the republic," says G. Kurt Piehler, director of the Center for the Study of War and Society.

Take Longstreet and Lee, for instance. Gen. James Longstreet lost his honor, in the eyes of fellow Confederates, for criticizing the war strategy of Confederate commander Robert E. Lee during the Civil War.

"Virtually every war will create these controversies," says Piehler.

Already, the first drafts of history on the war in Iraq are laying the groundwork for future debates. Think Abu Ghraib. Think WMD or lack thereof.

The Iraq conflict -- another war full of controversy. The similarities haven't escaped Diane Acosta. She's a state prosecutor from Arizona who was visiting the Vietnam Veterans Memorial the other day when she said of Vietnam, "I think people always will debate it."

They will continue to question the morality of the war, whether there was honor in it.

They will ask: "Should we even be there? And once we're there, what do we do?"

Acosta's change of tense seems to conflate Iraq and Vietnam. The questions, she says, are "for both."

She and her husband, Don Acosta, retired from an arms manufacturer, aren't too taken with the whole debate about honor and who's got more of it. Don Acosta, 56, sees it simply.

"I have friends on that wall," he says solemnly. He's remembering one friend in particular, a Michigan kid named Mike Elmy.

"I'm flashing back right now to that afternoon," Acosta says of his youth in Pontiac. "The neighborhood was on the porch when the Army officials pulled up to tell them they'd found Mike's remains."

To Acosta, who did not fight in the war, the honor of service is in just being there. And Kerry was there.

"He could be on this wall, too. Very easily," Acosta says. "Did he cut and run? I just don't believe that. . . . Not that I'm a big Kerry man, 'cause I'm not."

He's a Bush man. Was in 2000, will be again. Still, he jabs a finger toward that granite wall and says emphatically of Kerry, "I think he stepped up [to the plate] with these folks."


< Back  1 2 3

© 2004 The Washington Post Company