washingtonpost.com  > Technology > Special Reports > Biotech

Quick Quotes

WTO Delays Decision on E.U.'s Biotech Ban

Scientists Allowed to Testify in Debate

By Paul Geitner
Associated Press
Friday, August 27, 2004; Page E02

BRUSSELS, Aug. 26 -- The United States will have to wait until next year to see its fight with the European Union over biotech foods resolved, as the World Trade Organization agreed to an E.U. request to bring scientists into the debate, officials said Thursday.

A WTO panel in Geneva decided Aug. 20 to allow expert testimony before deciding on the complaint filed last year by the United States, Canada and Argentina over the E.U.'s moratorium on approving genetically modified foods for sale in Europe.

_____Biotech Headlines_____
MedImmune Ends Some Vitaxin Testing (The Washington Post, Aug 31, 2004)
How to Kill Cancer So It Doesn't Grow Back (The Washington Post, Aug 30, 2004)
GOP Keeps Peace With Platform That Supports Bush (The Washington Post, Aug 27, 2004)
More Biotech News
_____Biotech Food_____
Biotech Food Special Report
WTO Agrees to Request in Bitech Dispute (Associated Press, Aug 26, 2004)
U.N. Touts Biotech to Boost Global Food Supply (The Washington Post, May 18, 2004)
Biotech Crops Could Help Poor Farmers, U.N. Says (The Washington Post, May 17, 2004)
 

Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


___Tech Policy/Security E-letter___
Written by washingtonpost.com's tech policy team, the e-mail version of this weekly feature includes an original news article and links to policy and cyber-security stories from the previous week.
Click Here for Free Sign-up
Read E-letter Archive


_____Special Report_____
Globalization and Its Critics
In-depth Reports by Region
World News and Updates
_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• TechNews Daily Report
• Tech Policy/Security Weekly
• Personal Tech
• News Headlines
• News Alert

That means the panel's report, initially expected before the end of this year, now will be delayed until late March, according to WTO documents.

The United States argued that scientific advice was not needed because the case revolved around legal issues, while the E.U. sought to move the debate from trade rules to health and environmental protection.

A U.S. official said the government accepted the panel's decision and would help frame the questions to be debated. There was no immediate E.U. comment.

The E.U. ended its six-year moratorium in May when it allowed onto the market a modified strain of sweet corn, grown mainly in the United States.

Another herbicide-resistant corn was approved for animal feed last month. In both cases, the decision was made by the E.U.'s executive commission after ministers from the 25 member governments deadlocked on the applications.

The political stalemate highlights continuing unease in Europe over biotech foods, despite the introduction last spring of what are considered the world's most stringent labeling requirements.

The United States has said it will continue with its WTO case until it sees a "predictable, ongoing process" based on science, not politics. It also opposes the E.U.'s strict labeling, saying it unnecessarily scares away consumers.

Biotech crops have been widely grown in the United States for years, including corn and soybeans genetically modified to resist insects or disease. U.S. farm exporters contend the ban has stopped about $300 million in annual sales of bioengineered corn to Europe.

U.S. officials have expressed concerns that Europe's anti-biotech sentiment is spreading to developing countries, exacerbating global hunger.

WTO spokesman Peter Ungphakorn in Geneva said it was not unusual for the trade organization to seek scientific advice. Scientists have been called in to assist panels dealing with disputes over asbestos and animal- and plant-health issues.

An anti-biotech group, Friends of the Earth Europe, called the WTO panel's decision a first-round victory for the E.U. but attacked the "secretive and undemocratic" WTO for getting involved at all.

"Every country should have the right to put public safety before the economic might of the biotechnology industry," said Adrian Bebb, a spokesman for the group.

Associated Press correspondent Jonathan Fowler contributed to this report from Geneva.


© 2004 The Washington Post Company