washingtonpost.com  > Politics > Federal Page > Columns > In the Loop
In the Loop

Capitol Hell

By Al Kamen
Wednesday, August 4, 2004; Page A17

The new security measures taken by the U.S. Capitol Police appear to be sparking some grumbling from folks on Capitol Hill.

There is "no specific threat directed at the Capitol," the police announcement said, but "it is prudent to take certain measures to enhance security throughout the complex. These enhancements will include screening checkpoints for vehicles traversing the Capitol grounds."

_____In the Loop_____
Kerry's Sister Angers Abortion Foes (The Washington Post, Aug 2, 2004)
Simplifying the Pentagon Spreadsheet (The Washington Post, Jul 30, 2004)
Revolving Place Cards at Camp David (The Washington Post, Jul 28, 2004)
Now That's Rich (The Washington Post, Jul 26, 2004)
An October Surprise for the Dow? (The Washington Post, Jul 23, 2004)
More In the Loop
Add In the Loop to your personal home page.


Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• Politics News & Analysis
• Campaign Report
• Federal Insider
• News Alert

"Please be advised, that there may be significant backups and delays, even on streets that are not closed." But all is not necessarily lost. "We encourage anyone traveling near these areas to utilize alternate routes."

One House aide notes that "essentially the Capitol Police are suggesting we use alternate routes around the entire Capitol complex, which is a tad hard for all of us who live or work on Capitol Hill. Perhaps they forgot that this is an office complex, neighborhood and tourist destination."

Well, pal, better get used to it. Given that the measures are based on "recent events," most all of them three to four years old, there is very little likelihood the administration can soon, if ever, back down from a state of "high alert." (Imagine how a "never mind," issued anytime before the election, would play.)

A year from now, the specific site information will be four to five years old, but why would that make it any less reliable? Maybe if a more recent al Qaeda CD showed up with a top operative declaring earlier plans have been revised or abandoned -- Newark, of all places, as a top target? -- things might change.

But maybe the alert level will lower after the election. But why would that matter? The targets were not drawn up with any election specifics in mind. Given the criteria used to generate the latest "be very afraid -- go about your business" alert, it seems "orange alert" is going to be in place for a very long time.

So if you're bothered by the gridlock around the Capitol, best find a job somewhere off the Hill.

Take a Swim in the Motor Pool

As everyone knows, it's vitally important to create jobs in Iraq tout de suite, as some might say, given its unemployment rate is about 50 percent.

And no one is more aware of this than the U.S. Agency for International Development. So USAID is committed to putting Iraqis to work quickly. On its Web site, it says it is "dedicated to assisting the Iraqi people in rebuilding and developing the new, modern Iraq."

The agency says it's "looking for bright and motivated Iraqis to join our team. If you are looking for an opportunity to use your skills in a learning environment that promotes free thinking, presents challenges, and makes a real impact -- USAID is the place for you.

"This Web page will help you to discover possibilities for employment with USAID in Baghdad, and throughout the country. . . ."

So what jobs are available? Pretty good ones, it seems. There's a photo on the page of Iraqi civil engineers with hard hats surveying site preparation for a water-treatment plant. Looks like good jobs at good wages.

So what's actually posted on the site? There's only one type listed under "Vacancies." That would be: "Chauffeur," or, as some might say, driver.


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company