Sign Up: Free Daily Tech E-letter  
Technology Home
Tech Policy
Government IT
Personal Tech
   -Get Connected
   -Digital Cameras
   -Home Entertainment
Special Reports

Page 2 of 2    < Back   

Here, There, WiFi Anywhere


_____WiFi Special Report_____
Flexibility Comes Relatively Cheap (The Washington Post, Apr 25, 2004)
Seeking a Simple, Safe Connection (The Washington Post, Apr 25, 2004)
_____Finding WiFi Spots_____
Getting Online, On the Road (The Washington Post, Apr 25, 2004)
Getting Connected With the Hot Spots (The Washington Post, Apr 25, 2004)
_____The WiFi Effect_____
Share the Word . . . (The Washington Post, Apr 25, 2004)
Murky Was Clear Choice (The Washington Post, Apr 25, 2004)
Nice Presents, but Some Assembly Required (The Washington Post, Apr 25, 2004)
_____Live Online_____
Monday, 2 p.m. ET: Personal technology columnist Rob Pegoraro will be online to talk about The Post's special report on WiFi.

E-Mail This Article
Print This Article
Permission to Republish

Matthew Gast, author of a book about WiFi and an engineering consultant with Trapeze Networks, a California-based company that builds wireless networking equipment, said he didn't think that most people would encounter Kastner's gridlock scenario -- they live sufficiently far apart. But in densely developed areas with many Internet users, problems can arise.

He related a story he'd heard about one Florida suburb where so many signals jammed each other that residents formed an "ad hoc neighborhood spectrum allocation committee" of WiFi users.

"They went from house to house and assigned channels," he said. " 'You're interfering with your neighbor, move to Channel 6.' 'You're interfering with your neighbor, move to Channel 11.' "

But some WiFi problems can't be blamed on neighbors at all -- the enemy may lie within, in the form of other household gadgets that share WiFi's 2.4 GHz frequencies. Cordless phones operating at 2.4 GHz are often pointed to as leading offenders, although many WiFi users report that their 2.4 phones have no effect on their wireless networks.

Jeff Kunst, vice president of marketing at MobileAccess Networks, said he isn't sure that cordless phones cause much interruption in WiFi networks -- but to be on the safe side, he purchased a 900 MHz phone for his WiFi-equipped home office and left his 2.4 GHz phone parked in the kitchen.

If a user suspects a cordless phone is causing interference, Kunst said, moving the cordless phone's base station away from the wireless access point should solve the problem. Experts have sometimes recommended other low-tech ways to level the wireless playing field, such as lowering the phone's antenna or adding a higher-powered WiFi antenna to each computer on the network.

Other products that can tramp on WiFi's wavelength include Bluetooth-equipped cell phones, wireless baby monitors, wireless cameras and microwaves, but few reports point to them as major issues. Then again, say wireless engineers, who knows for sure?

"There's nothing that is black and white when you're talking about wireless," said Frank Hanzlik, managing director of WiFi Alliance, a trade group representing companies that build the wireless equipment.

A third gray area is the role of building structures. Older homes that incorporate plaster or cinderblock can block WiFi signals, while drywall construction generally lets WiFi through. The concrete floors in many apartment buildings and offices are tough obstacles, but the glass in windows is (unsurprisingly) no problem.

"It depends precisely on the type of construction, and I've seen the gamut," said Gast, the author. He recommended that homeowners put their WiFi access point as high inside a home as possible, allowing its signals to "rain down" on the house while avoiding such signal-stopping obstacles at floor level as heavy furniture. Hanzlik seconded this recommendation.

Gast used this approach when he installed a WiFi network in his parents' house, parking the access point on the second floor near the stairway.

One ultimate treatment for some interference problems involves switching to a different chunk of the electromagnetic spectrum. The Federal Communications Commission has opened up a batch of new frequencies in the neighborhood of 5 GHz that will allow for many more channels.

"It's quite a bit of spectrum," said Coleman D. Bazelon, a vice president with Analysis Group Inc., an economic consulting firm that has studied the issue. He anticipates "no foreseeable traffic jam" there. But most manufacturers have yet to commit to using this frequency. An existing WiFi variant, 802.11a, that employs the 5.8 GHz frequency has yet to take off, mainly because it's not compatible with most existing WiFi devices.

Meanwhile, efforts to tweak WiFi's current protocols to resist interference may forestall any need to move out of the 2.4 GHz neighborhood. Victor Marino, acting president at the Baltimore WiFi Internet provider Oneder Networks, noted that these ongoing improvements make the WiFi market not too different from the computing industry, in which new products can become obsolete the moment they ship.

"You're just seeing the birthing of a new industry here. . . . The more interest there is in this, the quicker the technology will get better," he said.

< Back    1 2
Print This Article Home

© 2004 The Washington Post Company

Company Postings: Quick Quotes | Tech Almanac
About | Advertising | Contact | Privacy
My Profile | Rights & Permissions | Subscribe to print edition | Syndication