washingtonpost.com  > Business > Special Reports > U.S. Economy

Quick Quotes

Page 2 of 2  < Back  

Liberal Group Decries Corporate Tax Slide

In Wednesday's corporate income tax report, the first since 2000, the group and its affiliated Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found that 82 of the 275 companies analyzed either paid no taxes or received large refunds in at least one of the past three years.

"The sharp increase in the number of tax-avoiding companies reflects the results of aggressive corporate lobbying and a White House and a Congress eager to do the lobbyists' bidding," said Robert S. McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice.

_____BOEING CO_____
(BA) Stock Quote and News
Historical Chart
Company Description
Analyst Ratings
_____SBC Communications_____
(SBC) Stock Quote and News
Historical Chart
Company Description
Analyst Ratings
_____Pepco Holdings, Inc._____
(POM) Stock Quote and News
Historical Chart
Company Description
Analyst Ratings
_____In Today's Post_____
Bid to Save Tax Refunds for the Poor Is Blocked (The Washington Post, Sep 23, 2004)
_____  The Economy _____

Interactive Graphic: Economy Over History
Report: The U.S. Economy



In 2003 alone, 46 companies with combined profit of $42.6 billion paid no federal income taxes and instead received rebates totaling $5.4 billion.

Twenty-eight companies had negative effective tax rates through the entire period, meaning that they received more in refunds and credits than they paid. Pepco Holdings Inc., the Washington utility, reported the lowest effective tax rate of the group, at minus-59.6 percent. Pepco paid no federal taxes on its $725 million in profit over the three-year period but received $432 million in tax "refunds."

Pepco Holdings received federal tax refunds in 2002 and 2003, in part because of large customer rebates the company then wrote off its taxes, said Jim Lavin, vice president and comptroller of Pepco Holdings. Pepco also benefited from tax breaks passed by Congress in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, he said.

But if the report looked at the company's large tax payments in 2000, the picture would look completely different, Lavin added.

"It's not like we're not paying taxes," he said.

Anne Eisele, a spokeswoman for the Boeing Co., said the report's numbers are flat wrong. Boeing paid $1.3 billion in federal taxes on $7.3 billion in earnings between 2001 and 2003, she said. According to the report, Boeing received cumulative tax refunds of more than $1 billion. Boeing received a $1.1 billion refund in 2003, but Eisele said that was an IRS repayment of tax overpayments from 1992 to 1997.

"The picture is a lot less clear than they are making it seem," she said.

The CTJ report said that actions by Congress and the Bush administration have caused corporate taxes to fall off.

In 1988, after a major tax-reform law closed huge corporate tax loopholes, the effective corporate tax rate stood at 26.5 percent. By 1998, that rate had slipped to 21.7 percent. And it has continued that slide, reaching 17.2 percent in 2002 and 2003, the CTJ said.

In 2002 and 2003, Congress passed business tax breaks worth $175 billion between 2002 and 2004, including a provision that allows companies to write off the cost of investments at a considerably faster pace. Twenty-five companies were able to claim $46.5 billion in tax savings from "accelerated depreciation" since 2001, led by SBC Communications Inc., which claimed $5.8 billion, according to the report.

Such tax breaks were supposed to spark corporate investment and jump-start the economy, but the study suggests the tax incentives "failed badly." The 275 companies in the study reported that their investment in property, plants and equipment had fallen by 15 percent since 2001.

SBC Communications claimed $5.8 billion in depreciation tax breaks between 2001 and 2003 but reported a 53 percent drop in new investments over that time.

John J. Stephens, vice president and controller at SBC, acknowledged that capital investment has fallen, but he blamed heavy regulatory disincentives that outweighed any tax breaks for the company's investment decisions.

"We carry an enormous tax burden for this country," he said, "and for that not to be made clear seems very inappropriate."


< Back  1 2

© 2004 The Washington Post Company