washingtonpost.com  > Politics > Elections > 2004 Election
SWING STATE : The Battle for Ohio

Boasts and Bluster in the Ground War

By John F. Harris
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, October 4, 2004; Page A01

CLEVELAND -- Bob Paduchik, who runs President Bush's reelection campaign in Ohio, likes to measure his progress with numbers. Here's one he cited with satisfaction: 175,000.

That was the number of new and presumably Republican voters his network of field organizers and volunteer activists had helped register, enabling them to cast ballots in the presidential election, as of late last month.


Bob Paduchik, far left, the Bush campaign manager in Ohio, discusses the president's next visit to the state with, from left, executive director Darrin Klinger, and volunteers Capera Clement of Dallas and Les Williamson of Mississippi. (Jay Laprete For The Washington Post)

spacer
2004 Campaign
___ Compare Bush and Kerry ___
spacer
Bush and Kerry Candidate Positions
A side-by-side comparison of the stands taken by President Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry.

___ More Election Coverage ___
spacer
Electoral College Map: Post analysis, polls and recent voting history from 16 swing states.
spacer
Live Discussions: Q&A With Post Reporters, Newsmakers and Pundits
spacer
News From the Trail: Updates and Analysis on Presidential, Senate and House Races




Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


About the Series

This occasional series on the presidential election in Ohio, which both President Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry have identified as a critical swing state, examines the evolving strategies and techniques for motivating supporters and persuading uncommitted voters in an age of deep partisan divides.

Or so he claimed.

J.B. Poersch, Paduchik's counterpart on John F. Kerry's campaign, paused when the 175,000 figure was recited to him. "That's a lot of voters," he noted coolly. Then his face soured, and he shook his head. "Uh-uh," he said emphatically, dismissing the GOP assertion as fantasy. "That's not the case."

Or maybe it is the case. This is the season of bluster in Ohio, the most battled over of battleground states, where every campaign is making boasts about its organizational prowess, and worrying anxiously about whether the boasts of opponents can be believed. Some liberal groups not affiliated with the Kerry campaign are asserting that they have registered 300,000 or even more voters, in a field organization campaign of unprecedented scope and intensity.

No matter the true figure, every poll that comes out in Ohio between now and Nov. 2 should include an asterisk -- or perhaps even a question mark. On all sides, this year's field operations are devoted to overturning the assumptions of pollsters -- about who will vote, and how many -- to the advantage of either Bush or Kerry, in ways that could produce an Election Day surprise.

For now, the Ohio ground game is kicking up plenty of dust, but the reality behind the fervent and sometimes contradictory boasts of who is winning is hard to discern. Not all of the claimed registrants are reflected in the latest official releases from the secretary of state's office, where information can lag coming in from 88 counties. Registration ends Monday, and no effort has been made yet to determine how many of the applications are duplicates of people already registered. Election officials, and even activists with the groups, acknowledge that a significant fraction of the 300,000 Democratic applications do not reflect new voters, much less represent a guarantee that these people will get to the polls.

In the meantime, registration efforts are generating controversy, including investigations over illegal registration of dead people and a Democratic lawsuit and petition drive accusing Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell (R) of narrowly interpreting rules in a bid to suppress Democratic votes.

For all the confusion, it is clear that, cumulatively, the efforts of the Bush and Kerry campaigns combined with the activities of independent groups mark this year as by far the most extensive ground battle ever in Ohio politics. In a state where voters know they are special -- thanks to 20 electoral votes and a history of backing every presidential winner since 1964 -- this year there is more of everything: volunteers enlisted, doors knocked upon, telephones rung, yard signs planted.

Amid the frenzy, a question looms: What is all this activity really good for?

The rarely spoken secret, even among the leaders of the Ohio ground game, is that no one is really sure.

"A really good ground game will get three to four percentage points," said Paduchik, a 38-year-old veteran of Ohio GOP politics. "We've never had a grass-roots organization like this in the state of Ohio," he noted, a novelty that means no one can say, "What's going to be real on Election Day?"

One person who insists his efforts will prove real -- and possibly decisive -- is Steve Bouchard, who is organizing the state for America Coming Together (ACT). Well funded from labor unions and deep-pocketed liberal benefactors, ACT is one of the new independent groups that seems especially large in Ohio and other swing states. ACT has saturated the state with legions of paid activists, an effort that by law must be uncoordinated with Kerry but that is aimed at getting him elected.

During a visit to ACT's local office here, near the campus of Case Western Reserve University and not far from the Cleveland Clinic hospital, Bouchard said, "If we are neck-and-neck on November 1st, then we are going to win on November 2nd."


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company