washingtonpost.com  > Education > Special Reports > Policy Special Reports > No Child Left Behind

State Officials Seek Changes In 'No Child'

By Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 24, 2005; Page A07

A bipartisan group representing 50 state legislatures yesterday called for major changes in President Bush's landmark education initiative, which it lambasted as unconstitutional and impractical.

The 77-page report from the National Conference on State Legislatures reflected widespread local unhappiness with the No Child Left Behind law, which sets out federal requirements designed to ensure that every student is proficient in reading and math by 2014. It said states should be given much greater latitude in interpreting the law and opting out of provisions that undermine local initiatives.

_____No Child Left Behind_____
Microsoft's Gates Urges Governors To Restructure U.S. High Schools (The Washington Post, Feb 27, 2005)
Veteran Fairfax Delegate Won't Run Again (The Washington Post, Feb 25, 2005)
Cost Analysis Of 'No Child' Law Backed (The Washington Post, Feb 25, 2005)
Full Coverage

Friday's Question:
It was not until the early 20th century that the Senate enacted rules allowing members to end filibusters and unlimited debate. How many votes were required to invoke cloture when the Senate first adopted the rule in 1917?
51
60
64
67


Republican state Sen. Steve Saland of New York, who co-chaired a task force that took 10 months to review implementation of No Child Left Behind, said the law imposes an impractical "one size fits all" education accountability system across the country that stifles local initiatives.

The report complained that the federal government provides less than 8 percent of the nation's education funds and seeks to impose an unworkable accountability system in return. The task force said that the federal government's role has become "excessively intrusive" in an area in which states have traditionally been permitted to take the initiative.

The report contends the law leads to lower academic standards, increased segregation, and the driving away of top teachers from needy schools. It alleges the government is violating the Constitution by coercing state compliance.

Over the past two years, more than a dozen state legislatures have adopted resolutions criticizing the No Child Left Behind law and demanding changes. But the bipartisan nature of yesterday's report, and the fact that it was issued by a group that represents legislatures in all 50 states, marked an escalation in the war of words surrounding the law.

In the administration's defense, Rep. John A. Boehner (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Education Committee, said critics "want the funding No Child Left Behind is providing, but they don't want to meet the high standards that come with it."


© 2005 The Washington Post Company


  • 

Business Schools


  •  Colleges and Universities

  •  Continuing Education & Professional Development

  •  Distance Learning

  •  Graduate Schools

  •  Law Schools

  •  Medical & Nursing Programs

  •  Summer Schools

  •  Technology Training