Sign Up: Free Daily Tech E-letter  
Technology Home
Tech Policy
Government IT
Personal Tech
Special Reports

Company Postings
Get Quotes
Press Releases
Tech Almanac
Page 2 of 2    < Back   

E-Voting Woes Prompt Virginia Study


_____Related Coverage_____
Electronic Voting Still In Infancy, Critics Say (The Washington Post, May 5, 2004)
Jolted Over Electronic Voting (The Washington Post, Aug 11, 2003)
_____Md. Coverage_____
New Machines Await Md. Voters (The Washington Post, Mar 2, 2004)
Suit Seeks Paper Receipt for Md. Voters Using Screens (The Washington Post, Apr 23, 2004)
Md. Split On Voting Machines (The Washington Post, Feb 29, 2004)
Md. Voting Machines Vulnerable, Firm Says (The Washington Post, Jan 30, 2004)
Ehrlich Seeks Probe Over Ballot Machines (The Washington Post, Sep 28, 2003)
Md. Plans Vote System Fixes After Criticisms (The Washington Post, Sep 25, 2003)
Voting Machines Will Be Scrutinized (The Washington Post, Aug 14, 2003)
_____Va. Voting_____
This Time, Fairfax's Touch-Screen Machines Meet Challenge (The Washington Post, Feb 11, 2004)
Voting Machines On Trial In Fairfax (The Washington Post, Feb 9, 2004)
Fairfax Voting Machines A 'Failure' (The Washington Post, Jan 10, 2004)
Fairfax To Probe Voting Machines (The Washington Post, Nov 18, 2003)
Fairfax Judge Orders Logs Of Voting Machines Inspected (The Washington Post, Nov 6, 2003)
___Tech Policy/Security E-letter___
Written by's tech policy team, the e-mail version of this weekly feature includes an original news article and links to policy and cyber-security stories from the previous week.
Click Here for Free Sign-up
Read E-letter Archive

_____Government IT News_____
Brookings Irked by Web Imitation (The Washington Post, May 24, 2004)
Navigating Government Contracting (Live Online, May 25, 2004)
The Ultimate Insider (The Washington Post, May 24, 2004)
More Government IT News
_____Full Coverage_____
Metro (The Washington Post, May 24, 2004)
Frederick Superintendent in Line for Fairfax Job (The Washington Post, May 23, 2004)
Campaign Further Divides Va. GOP (The Washington Post, May 19, 2004)
2004 Va. Elections
E-Mail This Article
Print This Article
Permission to Republish

Republican officials and Democratic Fairfax County election supervisors still disagree over whether a GOP school board candidate lost her race because of gremlins in the machines.

Fairfax County Elections Secretary Margaret K. Luca (D), whom county Republicans excoriated over the voting problems in November, said she is "pleased they opted for a study instead of jumping in and rushing to judgment on things."

Virginia Secretary of State Jean Jensen (D) said that she is happy that a commission will be formed, but said that she does not support requiring a paper trail.

"We don't want to assume that because we haven't had any big problems that we don't have any security issues," she said. "[But] I do not support a situation where the voter would be handed a piece of paper ... that shows how they voted. The potential for fraud is scary."

Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, said he believes no one will find a completely satisfactory solution to the problems confronting electronic voting. "Frankly, I don't know what they're going to find that everyone else hasn't already found," Sabato said.

"Even with paper ballots, as we learned in the 19th century, ballot boxes are often stuffed," Sabato said. "There is no foolproof system. None. There is always a way around it if people are determined enough to cheat." Luca said that Fairfax County precincts already allow voters to choose paper ballots if they do not want to use the new voting machines.

House Speaker Howell will appoint seven members of the panel, four of whom will be members of the House of Delegates and three will be private citizens. The Senate Rules Committee is responsible for naming the other appointees -- two senators and two private citizens. Committee Chairman Thomas K. Norment (R-Williamsburg) did not return telephone calls seeking comment.

The Virginia commission was originally ordered to report its findings and recommendations in early 2006, but a lengthy budget battle in the General Assembly prevented any work from being done until now.

That delay, according to one Republican activist who helped lead the fight to create the commission, means that any reforms that come out of the commission's deliberations won't be acted on until well after this year's primary and presidential elections.

"I have a very high sense that something bad will happen," said Fairfax attorney Chris Craig. "I don't believe that the problems that emerged this past November have been fixed."

< Back    1 2
Print This Article Home

© 2004 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive

Company Postings: Quick Quotes | Tech Almanac
About | Advertising | Contact | Privacy
My Profile | Rights & Permissions | Subscribe to print edition | Syndication