Sign In | Register Now
TODAY'S NEWSPAPER
Subscribe | PostPoints
Sign Up: Free Daily Tech E-letter  
Technology Home
Washtech
Tech Policy
Government IT
Markets
Columnists
Personal Tech
   -Get Connected
   -Digital Cameras
   -E-Music
   -Games
   -Handhelds
   -Home Entertainment
   -Laptops
   -PCs
   -Wireless
Special Reports
Jobs

Advertisement
Company Postings
Get Quotes
Press Releases
Tech Almanac

WiFi Promise Vs. Reality
The Wireless Technology Gets Put to the Speed Test

Advertisement


_____Live Online_____
Monday, 2 p.m. ET: Rob Pegoraro will be online to discuss his guide to digital cameras.
____WiFi Special____
WiFi Guide A New Wave of Wireless: From humble beginnings, wireless networking -- or "WiFi" -- has grown into a tool to expand the boundaries of the 'Net.
Fast Forward: Once You've Tried WiFi There's No Going Back

WiFi Tips:
WiFi Setup Can Be Tricky
WiFi Promise Vs. Reality
Better Security for WiFi


_____Recent Reviews_____
Four Tech Books For Dummies, And a Review of NCAA Football 2005 (The Washington Post, Jul 11, 2004)
Headphones With No Strings Attached (The Washington Post, Jul 4, 2004)
Spider-Man 2: The Game; Driver 3; WeatherBug 6.0; Agent Ransack (The Washington Post, Jul 4, 2004)
Snapping Out of Shutter Lag (The Washington Post, Jun 27, 2004)
_____Personal Tech_____
Full Section
Fast Forward
Web Watch
Ask the Computer Guy
Reviews
_____PC Headlines_____
Putting Pathogen Detection in the Palm of Your Hand (The Washington Post, Jul 12, 2004)
The Week Ahead (The Washington Post, Jul 11, 2004)
Muscle Laptops (The Washington Post, Jul 11, 2004)
Philippe Starck, Building a Better Mouse (The Washington Post, Jul 10, 2004)
More Headlines
E-Mail This Article
Print This Article
By Alan S. Kay
Special to The Washington Post
Sunday, April 20, 2003; Page H09

How fast is fast enough? Manufacturers of wireless networking gear tend to have a simple answer: "Whatever we just put on sale." But the picture is always more complicated.

On one hand, WiFi networks send data faster than can any cable or digital-subscriber-line Internet connection, which can make even slow WiFi feel fast to the uninitiated. On the other hand, WiFi never runs as fast as advertised. And so the reality may not come clear until after a long period of tweaking and puzzlement.

We spent two weeks putting three forms of WiFi -- 802.11b, the kind most people use, and two faster versions, 802.11a and 802.11g -- through their paces, testing eight access points and receiver cards.

The reviewed hardware included two 802.11b devices (Netgear's MR814 access point and MA401 card), three 802.11g units (Apple's AirPort Extreme base station and card, and Netgear's WG602 access point), two tri-mode a/b/g components (Linksys's WPC55AG access point and Netgear's WAG511 card) and one dual-mode 802.11a/b access point (D-Link's DI-764).

We set up basic WiFi networks and timed how long each took to transmit a 40.8-megabyte file.

The test environment was a two-story wood-frame house, vintage 1935. Why is this relevant? WiFi signals weaken not just over distance but also as they pass through physical objects such as walls, ceilings and fireplaces. In our tests, those obstructions outweighed distance in attenuating a WiFi signal. When the connection gets sufficiently weak -- in our tests, 20 percent of the original strength -- the WiFi hardware will give up on it.

Our benchmark was a wired network built on 100Mbps Ethernet technology, the traditional way to link computers. That moved the test file in 12 seconds every time -- a speed of about 27 million bits per second.

(Networks, wired or not, are amazingly inefficient for many reasons, including the overhead of their communications protocols. As a rule of thumb, real-world performance of half the promised speed is extraordinarily good, and day-to-day reality is likely to be half of that.)

Standard 802.11b WiFi offers a theoretical peak rate of 11Mbps; with access point and receiving laptop in the same room, the file transfer took slightly less than 80 seconds, for a speed of 4Mbps.

Moving that access point one floor away slowed the transfer time to 107.4 seconds (3.2Mbps). At 25 feet and two walls and a floor away, the signal began to fail. WiFi is supposed to work up to 150 feet away, but without an amplified antenna or open ground between access point and receiver, you will probably never see that range.

CONTINUED
1 2     Next >
Print This Article


TechNews.com Home

© 2003 The Washington Post Company

Company Postings: Quick Quotes | Tech Almanac
About TechNews.com | Advertising | Contact TechNews.com | Privacy
My Profile | Rights & Permissions | Subscribe to print edition | Syndication