washingtonpost.com  > Technology > Tech Policy > FCC

Quick Quotes

Page 2 of 2  < Back  

There's Gold In That There Dead Air

Allen B. Salmasi started NextWave in 1995 with a plan to become a wholesale provider of wireless spectrum to other companies. Salmasi made a fortune when he sold his satellite communications company to QualComm Inc. in 1988. He hoped that NextWave would help boost a wireless technology he helped develop at QualComm at a time when many U.S. companies were focused on a rival European technology.

But NextWave became mired in bankruptcy and its drawn-out fight with the FCC. The company would not even exist had it not engaged in a fiercely fought lobbying and litigation campaign in Washington, much of it funded by Wall Street financiers. At times, the company seemed to living from court decision to court decision as it wrestled with the federal government over possession of licenses to frequencies that it won in the 1996 auction but never paid for.


Allen B. Salmasi started NextWave Telecom Inc. in 1995. The company didn't work out as he had planned and is in bankruptcy protection. (Nextwave Telecom Inc.)

_____Graphic_____
Ready to Go: NextWave's Markets
_____FCC In The News_____
FCC Plans Record Fine For CBS (The Washington Post, Sep 4, 2004)
FCC Is Asked to Revoke the Licenses of Two D.C. Stations (The Washington Post, Sep 2, 2004)
High Court Petitioned on Cable Net Access Rule (The Washington Post, Aug 31, 2004)
FCC News Archive

Critics, including three FCC chairmen, have characterized NextWave's management and investors as little more than speculators who were trying to use the courts to poach billions of dollars in public assets.

In response, NextWave accused the FCC of trying to reclaim the airwaves just so it could sell them to higher bidders. In 2001, the FCC did just that, selling NextWave's spectrum for $15.8 billion.

The Supreme Court threw out the results of that auction, saying the FCC had improperly taken the assets of a company that was protected by its bankruptcy filing.

Wack noted that over the years, NextWave has put three different plans on the table that would have allowed the company to pay the FCC and build its networks, only to have its offers rejected or undermined by further litigation.

Even in the highly regulated telecommunications market, NextWave stands out as company that was, in effect, a creation of Congress and the FCC. It was founded in response to an FCC auction that gave entrepreneurs a chance to compete with bigger players as the government sold off huge pieces of the nation's airwaves in the mid-1990s.

In the 1996 auction, NextWave bid a total of $4.8 billion for 98 wireless licenses, giving the company a much sought after nationwide footprint. Like other so-called designated entities, NextWave qualified for the entrepreneur's auction by having total assets of less than $500 million.

So how did a company with less than $500 million in assets bid $4.8 billion?

In an effort to attract entrepreneurs that lacked the deep pockets of established telecommunications giants, the FCC decided to allow the upstarts to pay for their licenses through an installment plan. But the policy was a failure. Almost every participant ended up filing for bankruptcy before making the first payment.

For economists, the NextWave case has become a prime example of government policies gone awry. "They should never have had installment payments which turned the government into a creditor," said Simon J. Wilkie, a senior research fellow at the California Institute of Technology and former chief economist at the FCC.

Wilkie said NextWave and other participants in the auction overbid because they didn't need to have the money on hand and were betting they could raise more money from investors as the installment payments came due. But shortly after the auction, capital markets dried up. The value of the licenses plummeted as the FCC put more frequencies on the auction block.

Wilkie presaged the outcome in an academic paper published in 1996, two years before NextWave filed for bankruptcy. In an auction, Wilkie wrote, the goal is usually to buy an asset worth more than the final bid. "On the other hand, if the value is less than my bid, then I can default and my loss is now only my down payment." That is exactly what happened to NextWave when it defaulted after making a $500 million down payment.

During the eight-year legal battle between the company and the FCC, the central point of contention was whether bankruptcy or telecommunications law should apply to the case. NextWave argued for bankruptcy law, which meant that the agency was just another creditor eligible for potential payments of pennies on the dollar. The FCC argued that telecommunications law should apply and that the company was obligated to return the licenses since it had violated the agency's rules by failing to pay as scheduled.

In January 2003, the Supreme Court resolved the case in NextWave's favor and after almost 18 months of negotiations the company settled with the FCC last April. The deal called for NextWave to give up a portion of its airwaves as payment on the $4.3 billion it still owed. In effect, NextWave secured about $3 billion worth of licenses with a $500 million down payment.

After maintaining for years that it would operate a business if only the government got out of the way, NextWave officials now say that it may be too late. "The litigation consumed our original business plan but there are still market opportunities," Wack said.

Wack points out that although NextWave has no customers, it is living up to its promise dating to 1995 that it would build a network with national reach that uses the QualComm technology. "Everyone laughed at it, but it all came true," Wack said.


< Back  1 2

© 2004 The Washington Post Company