A Patient's Painful Search for a Clinical Trial
By Jim Shahin
Sunday, July 18, 2004; Page B05
I'll bet a story about drug companies keeping information from the public isn't most people's idea of exciting news. But most people aren't desperately trying to find the location of a clinical trial in the hopes that it might save their lives. After reading a recent newspaper account of how pharmaceutical companies routinely ignore a 1997 law designed to create a list of ongoing clinical trials for new drugs, I raced through the house, whooping ecstatically. "Vindicated!" I shouted.
The story about the Food and Drug Administration's registry of clinical drug trials appeared in The Post a week after my cousin Connie Ojile and I had returned to Washington from Houston. We'd gone there to see whether Connie qualified for a clinical trial for a new leukemia drug. Before we went, I'd tried my damnedest to get an answer to this question: Is the trial being held anywhere besides Houston?
It would be much easier on Connie to undergo a trial closer to home. But try as I did, I couldn't get the answer. Now I knew why. Not only were the companies flouting the law, but they weren't even required to register the specific trial Connie was looking at -- the very first, most preliminary trial to test a promising new experimental drug, the kind of trial that someone like Connie might be desperate to know something about.
The news -- both elements of it -- outraged me. But it also restored a bit of my dignity. I no longer felt inadequate for not getting the information Connie had wanted.
I cannot tell you how big a deal dignity is when you're dealing with cancer.
Connie and I, we know. We're a couple of old hands when it comes to leukemia. We know all about platelets and white blood counts and hemoglobin. If somebody forgets to give iodine before a certain test, we know to holler, "Hey, a little iodine over here." We check the date on the chemo to make sure it hasn't expired. That is, after we check the chemo label to make sure it's the right stuff in the first place.
I was diagnosed with leukemia after my gums started bleeding and my back radiated with pain so searing I couldn't sit up. That was 19 years ago, in 1985. Since then, I've had, let's see, a splenectomy, synthetic interferon, human interferon, something called 2-CdA (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) and probably some stuff I'm just not remembering at the moment. Now I'm in remission. Remission, of course, is not cure, and I am proof of that: I've fallen out of remission three or four times, depending on how you define it.
Connie has it worse than I do. That she has the disease at all is something that, personally, I think is weird -- two first cousins with two different kinds of leukemia out of only eight on that side of the family. What are the odds? She was diagnosed eight years ago with chronic myelogenous leukemia. CML, for short. (I had hairy cell leukemia. It's an appropriate name; I'm a hairy guy.) Since then, she has undergone radiation, a bone marrow transplant, and more or less constant chemotherapy. She has yet to achieve remission.
Last month, Connie's New York oncologist recommended she go to Houston to see if she qualified for a trial of a brand-new drug that might put her into remission, or at least arrest her cancer's advance. The trial was due to begin in just two weeks. Overwhelmed by the details of preparing for a clinical trial, Connie failed to ask her doctor if it was being held in multiple locations. I figured, no big deal, I can get the information easily enough. As the days dragged on without success, Connie called her doctor but couldn't reach her.
The drug was called AMN107. Or maybe AMN-107. At the time, I didn't know how to spell it because I couldn't find out anything about it. With so little time before Connie had to decide whether to go to Houston, I was desperate to find any information I could. I searched for the drug under both spellings, with a hyphen and without one. Either way, it was as if it didn't exist.
I searched the Web site of the manufacturer, Novartis, to no avail. I called the customer relations division, but the rep I spoke to hadn't heard of AMN107 and couldn't find it in her computer. I sent e-mail to the company, asking for info. I called back and talked to a different representative. She didn't know anything about the drug, either. She referred me to the Web site, which I'd already tried, and to its oncology section, which I'd also tried, and then to another site which, well, I tried, too: www.ClinicalTrials.gov. That is where the Food and Drug Administration is supposed to keep a registry of the nation's clinical trials. Guess what? No trials for AMN107 or AMN-107 were listed there.
I tried Googling. I got a couple of things in German. A trial, it seemed, was also being conducted in Frankfurt. Not exactly the close-to-home location we were looking for. I tried the Web sites of the NIH, NCI -- oh, I'm sorry, the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute. Those are the two primary government organizations that oversee research on diseases like leukemia. They don't seem to have much idea of what clinical trials are going on in this country. At least, based on their Web sites, they didn't know a thing about this one. I called a few leukemia and cancer organizations. Again, no luck. Even the Web site of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, the place conducting the trial Connie's doc had told us about, didn't have anything about it.
A rep at M.D. Anderson, though, did stay on the line with me and remained remarkably patient in the face of my increasing frustration. After first saying that perhaps I was mistaken about the name of the drug or the whereabouts of the trial, she discovered somewhere deep in the system, like going through the skin, the flesh, the bone and into the marrow to extract information about the progress of your leukemia, that, by golly, M.D. Anderson did have a clinical trial for AMN107 after all.
I finally found a little information about the drug (including the fact that its name didn't include a hyphen) at a Web site run by and for CML patients, www.CMLwatch.org. They knew about it because a few of them were in the trial. They didn't know, however, if a trial was being held anywhere other than Houston.
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
|
|
The Post's opinion and commentary section runs every Sunday.
• Outlook Section | | |
|