washingtonpost.com  > Technology > Tech Policy > E-Taxes

Quick Quotes

Correction to This Article
A Nov. 18 Business article about a bill that would ban Internet access taxes mischaracterized changes sought by Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.). Sensenbrenner sought to reduce the time Wisconsin could continue to collect such taxes before the ban would take effect.

Moratorium on Web Tax Advances

House, Senate Agree To Three-Year Ban

By Jonathan Krim
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 18, 2004; Page E01

Congress yesterday cleared the way to keep access to the Internet largely free from taxes for the next three years, breaking a year-long deadlock.

In a compromise, the Senate tweaked provisions of a bill it passed in April that reflected concerns by state and local governments that they could lose billions of dollars in tax revenue as more and more voice communication migrates to the Internet.

_____E-Tax Headlines_____
Congress Poised to Vote on Internet Taxes (washingtonpost.com, Nov 17, 2004)
Senate Backs Internet Tax Ban Extension (The Washington Post, Apr 30, 2004)
In Minn., Bush Takes a Cue From Clinton (The Washington Post, Apr 27, 2004)
More Coverage
___Tech Policy/Security E-letter___
Written by washingtonpost.com's tech policy team, the e-mail version of this weekly feature includes an original news article and links to policy and cyber-security stories from the previous week.
Click Here for Free Sign-up
Read E-letter Archive


The House, which had approved a broader, permanent tax ban last year, agreed to replace it with the Senate version, according to a spokesman for Rep. Christopher Cox (R-Calif.), one of the House bill's sponsors. He said he expects the House to vote on the measure today, and the White House has already signaled that President Bush would sign it.

"The Internet makes American workers and companies more productive," Cox said in a statement. "By protecting consumers from new taxes, the new law will keep Internet access affordable."

The often-stormy dispute pitted some lawmakers, including former governors from cash-strapped states, against others who favor less taxes across the board. Many industry groups supported the permanent ban, arguing that the certainty of no taxes would encourage electronic commerce and spur more people to switch to high-speed Internet service, which is more expensive than dial-up telephone access.

Most consumers already are free from such taxes as a result of a three-year moratorium that expired last year. The law meant that states could not impose taxes on the monthly fees charged by Internet service providers, a tax that is often passed on to consumers.

But the original law was written before there was widespread use of high-speed Internet access over telephone lines, known as DSL. As a result, several states, which have authority to regulate and tax telecommunications services, were collecting taxes on DSL service.

Similar taxes were not being collected for Internet service over cable lines, which is not classified as a telecommunications service by the federal government. And some states had begun collecting taxes before the original moratorium took effect and had been allowed to continue.

The new bill would ban Internet access taxes, regardless of technology, until November 2007. It also ensures that products bought over the Internet cannot be taxed by more than one state and prohibits discriminatory taxes that treat Internet purchases differently than other types of sales.

But state officials, whose concerns were spearheaded by Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.), won important concessions that softened what they said would amount to a giveaway to telecommunications and Internet companies.


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company