Lots of readers had follow-up questions on a column in which experts said it may not be a good idea to add the names of your children (adult or underage) to the deed of your home.
Here are some of those questions, plus answers from two lawyers who specialize in estate planning and real estate:
Got a Personal Finance Question?  • Transcript: Personal finance columnist Michelle Singletary was online to talk about last-minute tax filing tips, getting your finances organized and any other personal finance topic on your mind.
• Submit a Question/Comment Now. | | |
|
Q A couple of years ago, my mother and her husband added my nephew -- a minor now age 16 -- to their deed. The house has no mortgage. My mother realizes that this wasn't a wise move. She wants to reverse it but was told that it would cost about $1,000 and that my nephew would need a court-appointed representative. Is this true?
A"This is one of the reasons why one should almost never put a minor [a person under 18] on the title to a property," said Arthur F. Konopka, a Washington area lawyer. Konopka said that when the minor became a part owner of his aunt and uncle's property, that portion of it (probably one-third) became truly his. Since he is under the age of legal majority, he is not legally able to sell or give back his share of the property. As a matter of fact, the mother and husband cannot sell or refinance, because each of those events would require a signature by the nephew. Since the nephew cannot act for himself, someone has to be appointed to act on his behalf and to protect his interest in the property. (And it will probably cost more than $1,000, Konopka said.)
Can I register my two daughters as third and fourth owners of our house to avoid paying a future lien from a bill collector?
Whatever portion of the house is not transferred to the daughters could still be reachable by a parent's creditor, said Louis Hamby, a real estate and estate-planning lawyer in Palm Beach, Fla. "Additionally, creditors of the 'new' owners could now attack their interests." Also, Hamby said, any transfer made with the knowledge that creditors were looming could be set aside as a fraudulent conveyance, depending on the circumstances.
But Konopka points out that much depends on the way the house is titled. Since the reader said "our," she may have been thinking about the unique status a husband and wife have if they have taken title to their property as "tenants by the entirety," Konopka said. If the parents of the two daughters own the property under a tenancy by entirety arrangement, the bill collector cannot attach any portion of the real estate unless the debt is owed by both husband and wife, Konopka said.
Isn't it true that when you add children to the title of your home you may be deeding to them a big capital gains bill? If, on the other hand, they inherit the property, they can use the value of the property upon a parent's death as their own stepped-up cost basis. Right?
That's right. When people inherit property and then decide to sell it, they pay capital gains only on the amount by which the property has gone up in value from the date of death, Konopka said. For example, suppose a couple bought their home for $20,000 in 1955 and the home is worth $300,000 at their death. An adult son inheriting the property gets it with a fair market value of $300,000. If it is immediately sold, there is no tax due because there has been no gain. But if the son's name is added to the title before the parents' death, he doesn't get the full stepped-up basis.
Do you have to record a deed for it to be legal?
