U.S. Halts Attacks On Sadr's Militiamen
Senor, the occupation spokesman, said the Coalition Provisional Authority had not given up its two minimum demands on Sadr.
"We have not altered our position with regard to the need to dissolve and disarm Moqtada's militia throughout Iraq or with Moqtada al-Sadr's obligation to meet the requirements in the arrest warrant issued against him," he said. Senor said he expected Sadr to meet with Shiite mediators "to resolve these issues as soon as possible." He declined to set a deadline for compliance.
However, Mowaffak Rubaie, a Governing Council member and spokesman for the mediators, said the question of Sadr's murder charge "has been left for negotiation." He also raised the possibility that Sadr could participate in party politics. "I see no reason to bar any movement that is willing to resort to the polls," he said.
The negotiations over Sadr marked the second time in recent months that occupation forces, faced with intransigent resistance in an Iraqi city, pulled back from an ultimatum.
In Fallujah, the Sunni stronghold west of Baghdad where Marines fought pitched battles with insurgents, American authorities gave up on demands that fighters surrender their weapons, turn over the killers of four American contractors and surrender foreigners who had joined the insurgency. Instead, they permitted former members of ousted president Saddam Hussein's army to take over security in Fallujah, although ambushes and roadside bomb attacks on the Marines in areas around the city have persisted.
As in Fallujah, the issue in Najaf is whether the compromise will simply turn the city into a haven for anti-American forces. Outside the Imam Ali shrine, Mahdi Army fighters spouted defiance.
"We will not withdraw, because no one in Najaf will protect Moqtada," said Haidar Numani, who traveled to Najaf from Baghdad's Sadr City slum. "I prefer to stay here and defend him."
"We won and they lost," said Hasanein Ali, a guerrilla from Nasiriyah, southeast of Najaf. "They are going to withdraw from the city, not us."
In Baghdad's Sadr City, another Mahdi Army stronghold, residents who oppose Sadr said they were outraged by the news from Najaf.
"They are going to stop going after him after a month when people got killed just to get rid of him? They trust him? If tomorrow he disagrees with them for any reason, he'll call thousands of men into the streets. They should finish what they started," said Salaam Hussein, a teacher who moonlights as a grocer.
"We are the losers, thanks to the Americans," said Nouri Lami, an old man sipping coffee on a cinder block in Sadr City.
The top U.S. military spokesman in Iraq, Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, described Sadr's offer as "a positive step" and said: "The very few forces we had entering any portion of Najaf today, they weren't being attacked, they weren't being shot at. What we're hoping to see in a very short period of time is Iraqi police vehicles going through . . . Iraqi policemen on the corners of the city, Iraqi police buildings back in operation, the governor being able to talk about how to take Najaf forward."
Both Senor and Kimmitt carefully avoided using the word "agreement" to describe the moves by each side. As for the U.S. role, Senor said it was initially passive. A letter from Sadr "was issued," he explained, and "we responded to it. We said we respect the process that has been launched. We are pleased and think this is a positive sign that Iraqis are taking the initiative. . . . And we are going to be responsive."
Senor said that the Sadr letter resulted from negotiations held by a caucus of Shiite leaders on the U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing Council and that U.S. officials had no contact with Sadr.
Fighting in Najaf had taken a heavy toll on the Mahdi Army, killing scores of guerrillas, Sadr's aides said. Several civilians, including children, were killed in the crossfire, and the city's market areas were heavily damaged.
Special correspondent Saad Sarhan in Najaf contributed to this report.
© 2004 The Washington Post Company