washingtonpost.com  > Metro > Maryland > Government > Legislature > Gambling

No Deal On Slots In Md.

Talks Between Ehrlich, House Leaders Falter

By Matthew Mosk
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, August 14, 2004; Page B01

Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s goal of legalized gambling in Maryland, his signature program that dominated two General Assembly sessions and triggered a round of negotiations this summer, now appears more elusive than ever.

Recent talks of a compromise that would have placed the matter before voters in November broke down yesterday. Aides to the Republican governor and Democratic House leaders, who broached the proposal for a deal last week, said they see no clear path to an agreement.

_____Slot Machines_____
Busch Bill Proposes Compromise on Slots (The Washington Post, Aug 7, 2004)
Miller Warns His Party on Slots (The Washington Post, Aug 6, 2004)
Md. Delegate's Ties to Track Owner Raise Questions (The Washington Post, Aug 5, 2004)
Delegates, Ehrlich End Slots Talks Deadlocked (The Washington Post, Aug 3, 2004)
More on Slot Machines
___  Legislative Roundup ___

Get the latest news on your state legislators and issues at the forefront of the 2004 general assemblies.
Primers: Maryland | Virginia
News: Maryland | Virginia

AUDIO
Va. Legislators' Listening Tour
Post reporters offer a weekly review of state assembly news:

_____Free E-mail Newsletters_____
• News Headlines
• News Alert

"I have no reason to be optimistic," said House Speaker Michael E. Busch (D-Anne Arundel).

The governor and Busch now appear to be scuffling over who will bear responsibility for any political fallout generated by the failure to bring slot machines to the state, advocates and lawmakers said this week.

State Republican Party Chairman John M. Kane placed blame squarely on Busch and predicted that "ultimately, it will become a major election issue and will cost Speaker Busch his leadership seat."

However, Montgomery County Executive Douglas M. Duncan, a likely Democratic gubernatorial candidate in 2006, had a different view of the deadlock: "If the governor can't get his top priority through the General Assembly, it will speak volumes."

The failure to resolve the matter this summer has had other implications for both supporters and opponents of the gambling initiative.

In an interview yesterday, Orioles owner Peter G. Angelos said his family's plan to purchase the harness track at Rosecroft, a possible future home to slot machines, has been put on hold.

"It's in a suspended state, but I wouldn't say it couldn't be revived," Angelos said.

Though Angelos said there were many factors at play in the decision to slow his pursuit of the financially troubled racetrack, one person familiar with the deal said the baseball owner's family had calculated that it would lose several million dollars a year at Rosecroft until the arrival of slots.

The minority owner of the Pimlico and Laurel Park racetracks, Joseph A. De Francis, predicted yesterday that the lack of a timely resolution to the slots debate could spell doom for the state's entire horse racing industry.

De Francis said the prospect of a deal for slots, which could infuse the industry with tens of millions of dollars each year, has been barely containing the industry's exodus to Pennsylvania, where the machines recently became legal.

He said this summer's inaction could unleash that exodus and likened himself to a man "standing at the bottom of a dam that is about to burst."

"We're looking up at the dam, and we see the water slopping over the lip, and we hear the timber starting to creek and groan, and we're hoping someone will come and save us from seeing this burst over top of our heads," he said.


CONTINUED    1 2    Next >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company