A Steal on Any Street?

By Warren Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, September 9, 2001

You do some things for pride. When loss is imminent, you try harder. You fight back, take a beating, but win some measure of self-respect.

Oldsmobile understands. It's the oldest car division of General Motors Corp. It's going out of business in three years -- clobbered by falling sales, rising competition and GM's bureaucracy.

The company's executives allowed Olds to languish for a decade with noncompetitive products in a market increasingly influenced by innovative, sharply styled rivals. By the time GM realized its mistake in 1992, it was too late. Olds was a goner.

But it wasn't going quietly. Olds stalwarts were determined to show their automotive prowess. They rolled out some winners -- the Aurora, Intrigue and Alero sedans, and now the Alero coupe.

It's a good way to say goodbye.

I drove two versions of the 2002 Alero coupe, an economical four-cylinder GX model and a surprisingly fast and agile V-6 GL2 Sport. Both were equipped with five-speed manual transmissions, rare gearboxes for Oldsmobile. Both were good values for the dollar.

I spent most of my time in the four-cylinder Alero GX. It came with one of GM's newest engines, an all-aluminum, 2.2-liter 140-horsepower job that gets 25 miles per gallon in the city and 33 on the highway when mated to the manual transmission. That is a 3-mpg increase for city travel and a 1-mpg gain for highway cruising over the four-cylinder engine previously used in Aleros.

Both the Alero GX and GL2 Sport hold 14.1 gallons of regular unleaded gasoline. I drove the Alero GX on a 500-mile round trip from Northern Virginia to New York City on 1 1/2 tanks of fuel, including gallons wasted in congestion on Interstate 95 and the New Jersey Turnpike.

Overall, it was a good drive. The GX's cloth-covered front seats were comfortable. Road noise was minimal. Acceleration was competent, facilitating quick lane changes in traffic moving at about 70 mph.

I wound up feeling good about the car, only because I expected so little from it. I thought it would be heavy and loosely built in comparison to models such as the Honda Accord coupe. But the Alero GX actually weighed less -- 2,946 pounds, vs. 2,967 for the comparable 2.3-liter, four-cylinder Accord.

The Alero GX also was just as tight as the Accord. There were no rattles, squeaks or anything of the sort. It also handled as well in crash-avoidance maneuvers (a normal part of driving on I-95) and in dense urban traffic.

The difference?

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2001 The Washington Post Company