Congress Acts to Curb Offensive Programs

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Jonathan Krim
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 10, 2004

A Senate panel yesterday paved the way for a broad crackdown on radio and television programming deemed offensive, including stiff fines for entertainers who break indecency rules and limiting violence that can be seen by children.

With the House scheduled to vote Thursday on its version of an indecency bill, Congress is moving swiftly in the wake of public outcry over a Super Bowl halftime show in which performer Janet Jackson's breast was bared by singer Justin Timberlake. President Bush has indicated he supports the House legislation, which would allow fines of up to $500,000 per incident that could be levied by the Federal Communications Commission against violators of its indecency rules.

But the Senate Commerce Committee sharply raised the stakes for the entertainment industry, which has pledged to police itself and has been careful not to openly oppose tougher FCC regulation.

The Senate bill would temporarily roll back controversial rules passed by Congress late last year that allow some media organizations to get larger. By a 13-10 vote yesterday, the panel passed an amendment sponsored by Sens. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.), Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine) that would put the rules on hold for a year until the General Accounting Office can study the relationship between indecent programming and media consolidation.

"These issues are inevitably related," said Dorgan, who last year led an effort in the Senate to roll back the new media ownership rules. But Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), who sponsored the overall bill, said the amendment would be "a deal killer" that threatens passage of any indecency legislation.

If the provision survives a full Senate vote and then negotiations with the House, it would pose a challenge for FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell, who supported even greater easing of media concentration rules, while also beating the drum for tougher indecency enforcement.

Jonathan Cody, a legal adviser to Powell, responded that the FCC has seen no evidence that the issues are linked. In fact, Cody said, the presence of intense media competition in the Internet age has driven programmers to use more and more sexually driven programming, because it attracts viewers and listeners and sells advertising.

The Senate panel also passed an amendment by Ernest F. Hollings (D-S.C.) that directs the FCC to investigate whether technologies designed to block violent content, such as the V-chip, are working.

If they are found to be deficient, the amendment empowers the FCC to curb violent programming during hours when children are likely to be watching. It also would prohibit violent programs from being broadcast if they are not properly coded so they can be electronically blocked by parents.

A spokesman for Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), lead sponsor of the House bill, said the congressman hopes that unrelated provisions, concerning media ownership and violence, for example, will not be attached to a final bill that would be sent to President Bush.

Like the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the Senate panel approved increasing fines for indecency, from the current $27,500 per incident to a maximum of $500,000 after a third violation.

The House version allows for a $500,000 fine after a first offense, and requires the FCC to consider revoking a broadcaster's license after three violations. The Senate bill would require license revocation be considered with any fines, and allows the FCC to double fines for indecent, obscene or profane language or images when the offending programming was scripted or planned in advance, or if the audience was unusually large -- such as for a national or international sporting or awards event.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2004 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity