| Page 3 of 3 < |
British Politics Dives Into the Web
A Party of Parties
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
While Conservatives and Labor nearly always take the top spots in an analog to the Republicans and Democrats and the Lib Dems take the "third party" title, Britain is a truly multiparty polity and there are many other groupings with all sorts of variations and differences. Check out this Web site for a list of links. Among them is the Official Monster Raving Loony Party, not to mention a party built around marijuana legalization . And as many people know, English is not the only language of the British Isles. Fewer people over the years speak the various Celtic languages ( Cornish and Manx have been declared dead, though each has a dedicated coterie of non-native speakers keeping it alive), but Wales's pro-independence party Plaid Cymru offers a Welsh homepage, and Northern Ireland's political parties offer Irish Gaelic pages as well. I have not been able to find any pages offering Scots Gaelic options except for the Scottish Socialist Party. As for pages in the "Scots" dialect of English, I'm not so sure there's a demand these days. What kind of MacMillan am I?
Fleet Street, the Election and You
The Washington Post's London correspondent, Glenn Frankel, shows up in a Daily Telegraph article which confirms my fear that some of you might never get this far into this scintillating column. Frankel -- at considerable length -- answers this fundamental question: Are Americans paying attention to this race? His answer, I'm sorry to say, is, "Not very much, I'm afraid."
He notes ongoing coverage from The Post, the New York Times, and Time and Newsweek magazines, but says for the most part that newspaper articles are few and far between. "As for television news coverage, forget it," Frankel says. "Most Americans have never heard of Michael Howard, and might mistake Charles Kennedy for a distant cousin of the late John F. Kennedy. Even Gordon Brown barely registers on the name-recognition scale."
Fortunately, there is plenty of coverage from London's big dailies and tabloids and news services:
Far from languishing in thrall to the "MSM" (Main Stream Media), the run-up to Thursday's elections has been tracked in loving -- nay, obsessive detail by hundreds of bloggers. Oxford's Coleman may be a big cheerleader for the Internet's role in campaigns, but he does not exaggerate when he suggests that this is the year of the blog in U.K. politics. Rather than hold forth on their value or credentials, I'll provide comment-free links to three sites that provide perhaps more reading material than the Bodleian and British libraries combined.



