Live Q&As   |   Archive   |   Book Club   |   E-Mail Newsletter Weekly E-Mail   |   RSS Feeds RSS Feed

Boomerang Kids Refill the Nest

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Michelle Singletary
Sunday, May 15, 2005

When I asked parents whether their adult children, particularly college graduates, should be allowed to move back home, the responses generally fell into two camps.

In one were those parents who vehemently believe their job is done after 18 years of home training and another four or five years of supporting their children through college. Once these young adults have degrees, it's time to kick them to the curb, they argue.

"I believe it is appalling that so many young people consider it their right to move home after an expensive education meant to secure their futures as wage-earning adults," one reader wrote. "I would think graduates would think past their home base to the freedom and personal pride in having achieved the goal they worked so hard to obtain. Perhaps some of the degrees earned are no more than a piece of paper to nowhere."

Here's what Kaye Gibbs, a single mother from Pennsylvania, said: "Parents are not cushions or havens from life. In other words, take care of business. No one, especially your parents, owes you a free ride."

By taking care of business, all the parents in this camp believed that young adults, especially college graduates, needed to figure out how to finance their own life.

"This trend of continuing to depend on someone else for their own welfare is disturbing and, I believe, harmful to the children's, and indeed America's, future," wrote C.H. "Bud" James of Vidor, Tex. "Most of the cases I have seen are simply that they have it good at someone else's expense, and they are too lazy to take responsibility for their own lives. And the sheer gall of a college graduate to come home is unbelievable. What about the parent's right to an easier life? These young people, college grads or not, need to get off their duffs."

In the second camp were parents who see the family home the way a baseball player sees the dugout. It's where their children can come when they strike out at life's fast financial pitches.

"In my 26-year-old daughter's case, she has never left," wrote Mary Ann Lakeman of Buffalo. "Dreams die hard. This generation has had to face that fact much quicker than mine did. Today, education is very expensive and good-paying jobs are few and far between. Their dream job may have been outsourced to China or India and what is left is what they may have to settle for. It's a sad state of affairs for today's youth."

We know that the top reason people go back home is for economic relief. But is that so bad?

Susan Knapp of Quartz Hill, Calif., thinks so. She wrote: "People do not grow and develop into productive adults when they live at home with their parents. Living in a one-room flat and riding the bus to work does wonders for motivation and determination."

I don't think that's an absolute truth.

You know your child. You know if you've got a trifling young adult whose return home is just another bad decision in a long history of bad decisions. You know that what he really wants is his mama's house to be his hotel.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2005 The Washington Post Company