Page 2 of 2   < Back     

Senators Avert Showdown Over Filibusters

"Many of these nominees have waited for quite some time to have an up-or-down vote and now they are going to get one. That's progress," presidential press secretary Scott McClellan said. "We will continue working to push for up or down votes for all the nominees."

At the same time, even Republicans said the agreement would force a change on the White House.

Senate Minority Leader Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., left,  and Senate Majority Leader Sen. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., right,  seen in these images from video, speak from the floor of the Senate in Washington Wednesday, May 18, 2005 as the Senate began debating the nomination of Priscilla Owens to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.  (AP Photo/APTN)
Senate Minority Leader Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., left, and Senate Majority Leader Sen. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., right, seen in these images from video, speak from the floor of the Senate in Washington Wednesday, May 18, 2005 as the Senate began debating the nomination of Priscilla Owens to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. (AP Photo/APTN) (AP)

"Judges are going to get a vote that wouldn't have gotten a vote otherwise. We're going to start talking about who would be a good judge and who wouldn't. And the White House is going to get more involved and they are going to listen to us more," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., one of the bargainers.

The deal was sealed around the table in McCain's office, across the street from the Capitol where senators had expected an all-night session of speech-making, prelude to Tuesday's anticipated showdown.

Nominally, the issue at hand on the Senate floor was Bush's selection of Owen to a seat on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

In fact, as the rhetoric suggested, the stakes were far broader, with Republicans maneuvering to strip Democrats of their right to filibuster and thus block current and future nominees to the appeals court and Supreme Court.

There currently is no vacancy on the high court, although one or more is widely expected in Bush's term. Chief Justice William Rehnquist's coincidental presence in the Capitol during the day was a reminder of that. At age 80 and battling thyroid cancer, he entered the building in a wheelchair on his way to the doctor's office.

The agreement came as Frist and Reid steered the Senate toward a showdown on Bush's nominees and historic filibuster rules, under which a minority can prevent action unless the majority gains 60 votes.

For decades, Senate rules have permitted opponents to block votes on judicial nominees by mounting a filibuster, a parliamentary device that can be stopped only by a 60-vote majority.

But Republicans, frustrated by Democratic filibusters that thwarted 10 of Bush's first-term appeals court nominees and prepared to block seven of them again, threatened to supersede that rule by simple majority vote.

In classic Senate style, the agreement was followed by a rush of self-congratulatory speeches _ and disagreement over what it meant.

Democrats, pointing to a slight change in wording from an earlier draft, said the deal would preclude Republicans from attempting to deny them the right to filibuster. Republicans said that was not ironclad, but valid only as long as Democrats did not go back on their word to filibuster only in extraordinary circumstances.

One official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the issue had been discussed at the meeting in McCain's office, and was "clearly understood" by those in attendance.

Apart from the judicial nominees named in the agreement, Reid said Democrats would clear the way for votes on David McKeague, Richard Griffin and Susan Neilson, all named to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Democratic officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, suggested that two other appeals court nominees whose named were omitted from the written agreement _ White House staff secretary Brett Kavanaugh and Pentagon lawyer William Haynes _ might be jettisoned. Republicans said they knew of no such understanding.

Some Democrats dissented.

Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., issued a statement saying that "Confirming unacceptable judicial nominations is simply a green light for the Bush administration to send more nominees who lack the judicial temperament or record to serve in these lifetime positions."

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., called the agreement "legislative castor oil. It averts the showdown vote tomorrow, but I doubt it's over," he said.


< Back   1    2

© 2005 The Associated Press