Q& A: Lebanon's Saad Hariri
The Next Prime Minister?
Stepping up? In preparation for national elections that start today, a Lebanese youth hangs photos of slain former prime minister Rafiq Hariri and his son, Saad Hariri, in downtown Beirut. The younger Hariri heads a slate of parliamentary candidates that is expected to do well.
(By Jamal Saidi -- Reuters)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Last February, when former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Hariri was assassinated, his son Saad, 35, was living in Saudi Arabia and working for his father's huge business empire. Now, the younger Hariri has chosen a different path, just as his country is emerging from years of Syrian domination. Today, Lebanon goes to the polls for the first round of this landmark election. Hariri is heading a slate of parliamentary candidates that is expected to win the most votes. The question on everyone's lips here: If his slate wins, will this political novice end up as prime minister or will he choose someone else to run the country while he learns the ropes? Last week, Newsweek-Washington Post's Lally Weymouth interviewed Hariri in his Beirut office.
Excerpts:
Are you going to become prime minister?
I am going to wait for the elections.
After the elections, are you ready?
I think with the [right] environment [and] the right alliances, I can try to be a prime minister, but we still have some symbols of the past who brought the country so much harm. If we are able to get rid of them after the elections, I would be interested in taking the post.
I assume you are talking about the current president, Emile Lahoud, who is reportedly very close to Syria's President [Bashar] Assad. Are you saying he must go?
I am saying that anybody who protected the security and intelligence forces in the past should not continue in their job, and he is one of them.
Lahoud seems determined to continue.
Everybody is determined to continue. Is he determined to continue in the same way -- where he let the intelligence [apparatus] interfere in every single department or ministry? If this is his determination, nobody wants it.
I asked Lahoud [recently] if the Syrians killed your father. . . .
And what did he answer? I would not want to point a finger until the --


