Maryland Adopts Computer-Recycling Fee

By Dina ElBoghdady
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 1, 2005

Starting next year, computer makers that want to do business in Maryland must kick in up to $5,000 annually to help recycle their products under a new state law designed to cope with the roughly 60,000 tons of "electronic waste" that pile up in Maryland each year.

The law, signed last month by Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R), affects only makers of desktop and laptop computers, including monitors, but it hints at expanding to include television sets in the near future.

Some of the country's largest computer makers helped shape the legislation and gave it the final nod, though many did so grudgingly. At least one of them, Hewlett-Packard Co., which has 20 percent of the U.S. market, has not decided if it will pass the cost on to consumers.

"It's too early to say" if Marylanders will get charged extra, said David Isaacs, the company's director of government and public policy. "The bill just passed, and we haven't determined our plans yet."

By adopting the legislation, Maryland thrust itself to the forefront of a debate on how to deal with the high-tech gadgetry that U.S. consumers jettison each year -- including about 50 million computers and 130 million cell phones.

While the federal government grapples with the issue -- recently issuing contracts to help agencies deal with their mountains of used technology -- a few states have weighed in. California, Maine and now Maryland are the first to experiment with cost-sharing arrangements for recycling environmentally damaging electronics. But they embrace different approaches.

California places the financial burden on consumers, charging a $6 to $10 disposal fee on every computer and television purchased. Maine puts the onus on manufacturers, demanding they pay the full cost of recycling their computers or televisions and pick up a share of the recycling tab for products of unknown origin.

Computer manufacturers gave a collective sigh of relief when Maryland, after years of debate, rejected Maine's concept and opted for a relatively small annual fee.

"It's much more reasonable," Andy Kendzie, a spokesman for International Business Machines Corp., said of Maryland's legislation. "We're very happy with it."

Retailers were ecstatic that Maryland did not follow California's lead and left them out of the mix.

"A fee at the point of sale would have stifled the retail market here," said Jeffrie Zellmer, legislative director of the Maryland Retailers Association. "A consumer in Bethesda would just pop across one of the bridges and shop in Virginia."

And environmentalists were pleased Maryland took what they view as a step in the right direction.

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2005 The Washington Post Company