Inside the Analysis
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The Washington Post analyzed Metro statistics to evaluate the agency's programs for buying new rail cars and overhauling older ones. Metro officials provided data on miles traveled, delays and mechanical failures for each brand and type of rail car, ranging from the oldest Rohr cars built in the 1970s to the latest-model CAF cars. The Post calculated statistics on breakdowns and on mechanical problems for each type using the most recent full year of data, through April.
The newspaper also analyzed Metro's efforts to rebuild escalators using agency statistics on units rehabilitated since 2000. For 128 escalators, The Post compared the percentage of time they were operating before the overhauls with their performance over an 18-month period ending in December. Metro did not provide statistics for every escalator because in some cases it did not have pre-renovation figures and in others the renovation had been completed too recently to be evaluated.
In addition, The Post compared escalators serviced by Metro employees with those serviced by private contractors, looking at the mean time between breakdowns and the mean time required for repairs. The data covered two years, ending in October, the most recent month for which Metro provided statistics.








