Red-Light Cameras Stop Rolling in N.Va.

Police Lament the End of Photo Surveillance

By Jamie Stockwell
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, July 3, 2005; Page C03

Police Lt. Paul Story was standing at a busy intersection in Alexandria last week when a motorist blew through a red light right in front of him. The officer took off running in his knee-high black boots, only to watch with dismay as the vehicle turned a corner and sped away.

"Twenty years ago, I would've caught him," Story, 55, shouted over the din of traffic.


Falls Church, like Fairfax and Arlington counties, has said it will keep red-light cameras such as this one in place. The city also installed sensors under roads to delay a light change in the opposite direction if they sense that a driver is going to run a red light.
Falls Church, like Fairfax and Arlington counties, has said it will keep red-light cameras such as this one in place. The city also installed sensors under roads to delay a light change in the opposite direction if they sense that a driver is going to run a red light. (By Lawrence Jackson -- Associated Press)
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Not too long ago, a camera might have.

At midnight Thursday, the last of 38 cameras in six Northern Virginia jurisdictions were switched off, ending a 10-year experiment that allowed them to photograph what amounted to hundreds of thousands of vehicles running red lights. Such cameras are still used in the District and Maryland.

The unceremonious end to the program in Virginia came four months after the General Assembly voted not to renew it, despite repeated efforts by local legislators, police and elected officials to keep the cameras rolling. Others, like Mark Stollenwerk, held up gleeful handmade signs at a Fairfax County intersection Thursday night to celebrate the end of what many have said they believe was a violation of their civil liberties.

"What's next, a chip in our cars that tracks everything that we do wrong?" asked Stollenwerk, leader of the Fairfax County Privacy Council, as he stood alongside other camera opponents waving signs that read, "Bye Bye Red Light Cameras."

Despite the varied reactions, one thing was certain as the program ended: The fight over the cameras is not over.

They may be out, but they're not down -- at least not in Fairfax County, Arlington County and Falls Church, where police plan to keep their cameras mounted on their perches to collect data.

"We're going to keep the cameras in place," said police Lt. Daniel Townsend, assistant commander of the traffic division in Fairfax, which used cameras at 15 intersections. "We won't be snapping photos, but we're going to continue to monitor . . . whether we get a spike in red light violations and crashes."

Falls Church has installed sensors beneath its roads that will delay a light change in the opposite direction if they sense that a driver is going to run a red light. Three municipalities -- Alexandria, Fairfax City and Vienna -- had not decided by last week whether to take their cameras down.

"We want to salvage as much as we can from the situation," said David Snyder, a council member in Falls Church, which had cameras at five intersections. The cameras "are a right that we ought to have in our own city because of the very unique and very near anarchy we have on the roads in Northern Virginia."

The cameras, which automatically photograph vehicles when they run red lights, were authorized as an experiment in 1995 by the Virginia legislature, though they were installed at various times.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2005 The Washington Post Company