Va. Rail Plan Exempted From Stricter Cost Gauge
Language in Federal Bill Benefits Tysons Project
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Tuesday, August 2, 2005
The project to extend Metrorail through Tysons Corner would be exempt from new federal cost standards under the transportation bill Congress passed last week, effectively removing a key guideline it would have flunked.
The exemption, tucked into the 321-page legislation, allows the controversial project to win federal funding despite scoring only a "medium low" rating for cost-effectiveness. A recent change in federal standards called for projects to receive a cost-effectiveness rating of "medium" or better.
"It means we don't have to meet the new criteria," said Marcia McAllister, a spokeswoman for the Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project, an arm of the state government. "The same rules for cost-effectiveness that we were subject to last year continue to apply."
Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.) inserted the provision. "This is not an exemption to cost-effectiveness standards," said his spokesman, John Ullyot. "Senator Warner wanted to make sure that the rules were not changed on us in the home stretch."
Three other rail projects, in Silicon Valley, San Francisco and Oregon, won the same exemption.
Critics of the project, now estimated to cost as much as $2.4 billion, said the exemption allows an unworthy project to win federal money.
As one of the most expensive proposed rail lines in the country, the Tysons project has been the focus of an almost philosophical battle over the competing virtues of road and rail projects.
"It's outrageous," said William Vincent, who supports a bus rapid transit connection over rail. "Those cost-effectiveness standards are in place to protect the taxpayers from waste and abuse. The exemption is an admission that this project is wasteful."
Cost issues have dogged Northern Virginia's rail effort, which eventually is supposed to extend Metro's Orange Line from about West Falls Church through Tysons Corner to Dulles International Airport and Loudoun County.
The hefty price of that 23-mile line has forced organizers to break the project into two phases, the first stopping roughly halfway, at Wiehle Avenue on the eastern edge of Reston.
But now even the first phase is running into cost troubles.
In June, the engineering firms developing the plan told Virginia transportation leaders that the project, as envisioned, probably would cost $2.4 billion, a 60 percent increase from the previous estimate.


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)




