Passing the Bar On Nutrition

(By Julia Ewan -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Sally Squires
Tuesday, August 23, 2005

The newest addition to the breakfast table lets you enjoy your favorite cereal without lifting a spoon, using a bowl or even pouring a drop of milk.

Breakfast bars made by Kellogg's, Post, General Mills, Quaker, Kraft and other companies offer a fast-food option to those eating on the run in the morning. Found just down the grocery aisle from their cereal cousins, many are fortified with enough vitamins to rival a multivitamin. To make up for the missing milk, some bars also contain plenty of calcium.

Compared with granola bars, cereal bars are generally sweeter, have less whole grain, less fiber and pack more added vitamins and minerals. Cereal bars are sometimes higher in calories, ranging from about 90 to 180 calories per bar. That likely won't sabotage your weight-loss efforts unless you eat a box of them all at once. And starting at about 50 cents per bar, they're affordable.

"I've been struck by their popularity, particularly among college students," said registered dietitian Ann Litt, author of "The College Guide to Healthy Nutrition" (Tulip Hill Press) and a nutritional consultant to the Washington Redskins. Litt sees the breakfast bars as successors to Pop Tarts and other convenience breakfast foods.

"The good news," she said, is that cereal bars "are portable and can be stored easily. . . . But she worries that they help fuel a trend of eating processed, packaged fare "that is not real food."

One big concern of nutritionists is that cereal bars often come packed with enough processed sugar to give a candy bar a run for its money. With a few notable exceptions (more on that later), they're also short on fiber and protein. Plus, a few come with an unwanted ingredient: trans fatty acids, an unhealthy type of fat.

So how do they taste?

"Too sweet" was the common complaint from a group of 17 newsroom staffers who volunteered for a Lean Plate Club taste test, conducted in the late afternoon when deadline stress often stokes appetites. The test was blind, although the multicolored Trix bars were easy to spot even without their wrappers. Each bar was cut into thirds or quarters to enable testers to sample the 11 brands tested.

Even so, many testers couldn't stomach trying all the samples. Most said they wouldn't eat any of the bars for breakfast. Many said they wouldn't buy them under any circumstances.

"Most of them are just so . . . Rice Krispies Treats," wrote one tester. Another noted that the bars wouldn't be appealing even as a snack or dessert. "I'd rather have the real thing," this tester wrote.

Even so, eating a cereal bar in the morning "is better than eating nothing at all," said registered dietitian Amy Jamieson-Petonic, a spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association. "Study after study shows the benefit of breakfast."

Here's a sampling of our taste test results:


CONTINUED     1           >



Get the Latest Lean Plate Club
Stay tuned to Sally Squires and the Lean Plate Club with this easy-to-use widget. It's simple to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new Lean Plate Club column.
Get This Widget >>


© 2005 The Washington Post Company