Panel on Md. Firings to Have Subpoena Power
Lawmakers Want To Examine Ousters During Ehrlich Era
Sen. Thomas M. Middleton and Del. Adrienne A. Jones meet with other legislators to decide the rules for the review of state worker firings.
(By Marvin Joseph -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Friday, August 26, 2005
A legislative panel reviewing firings of state workers by Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s administration will have subpoena power and the ability to hire outside counsel despite fierce objections raised by Republicans.
After striking a conciliatory chord earlier in the week, GOP lawmakers said yesterday that they are considering pulling out of proceedings after Democrats voted down a dozen amendments to rein in the panel's powers.
"This was a partisan steamrolling," said Senate Minority Leader J. Lowell Stoltzfus (Somerset), one of four Republicans on the 12-member Special Committee on State Employee Rights and Protections. "I think we threw fairness out the window."
Democrats, who hold large majorities in both chambers of the Maryland General Assembly, said their colleagues were overreacting and pledged an evenhanded review.
"They're protesting way too much," Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Calvert) said in an interview. "Our purpose is nothing more than to make changes in the personnel law. There are problems that arose, and they need to be addressed."
The committee was set up in response to complaints that Ehrlich, the first elected Republican governor in more than 30 years, had reached deep into the bureaucracy and pushed out longtime workers to make room for politically connected replacements.
Ehrlich spokeswoman Shareese DeLeaver said the panel was acting like an investigative committee, which requires an act of the full House or Senate to establish. Democratic lawmakers have been careful to characterize their work, formally authorized yesterday by a joint committee of legislative leaders, as a "review."
"There's a serious disconnect between the rhetoric of the committee and the actions that have taken place today," DeLeaver said.
Democratic leaders of the panel, which includes House and Senate members, restated a commitment to look at past Democratic administrations as well.
During one heated exchange, Sen. Thomas M. Middleton (D-Charles), co-chairman of the committee, told Stoltzfus that he was "looking for a serpent under every rock."
After failing to eliminate the power all together, Republicans sought to eliminate the panel's subpoena power, saying repeatedly that the Ehrlich administration has nothing to hide and that the move would set a dangerous precedent.
Although several legislative committees possess subpoena power, the last time legislative aides recall it being used was during a 1975 investigation of the Baltimore police department.







