Quick Quotes

Goodbye Mortgage Deduction?

Panel Looking at Tax Code May Rethink Housing Benefits

By Ryan J. Donmoyer
Bloomberg News
Saturday, August 27, 2005; Page F18

The status of housing as the least-taxed investment in the United States, which has helped fuel an eight-year boom in real estate values, may be in jeopardy as a presidential commission considers changes to the federal tax code.

The panel, which is headed by former senators Connie Mack and John Breaux and to report to President Bush by Sept. 30, is studying options to lower taxes on many types of investments to meet Bush's goal of spurring savings and economic growth. Changes to housing-related tax incentives will also be considered, Jeffrey Kupfer, the panel's staff director, said in an interview.


Panel member Bill Frenzel says colleagues will use caution.
Panel member Bill Frenzel says colleagues will use caution. (Len Spoden (703) 598-7427 - Freelance)

Economists say such policies would have the effect of eroding the relative advantage housing has enjoyed over other investments since 1997, when Congress effectively made most sales of primary residences tax-free.

"One of the pillars of strength of the housing market is the fact of the tax-advantaged nature of the asset," said Anthony Chan, a senior economist with JPMorgan Asset Management Holdings Inc. in Columbus, Ohio. "To the extent that you chip away at that, you would see housing somewhat negatively impacted."

Fueled by both favorable tax-law changes and the lowest interest rates in 40 years, the national median home price has risen 69.3 percent since 1997. That year, Congress allowed homeowners to exclude up to $500,000 in gains when they sell homes they occupy, and eliminated rules requiring sellers to buy more expensive homes to avoid taxes. Before that, sellers faced taxes as high as 39.6 percent.

Suddenly, homeowners could sell highly appreciated property and do anything they wanted with the proceeds. Taxes on the sale of homes that aren't a primary residence also have been reduced twice since 1997 to rates as low as 5 percent.

The tax-free treatment of home sales made it easier for empty-nesters like Monica Anderson of Tallahassee to sell their homes and move to condominiums or rented apartments.

Anderson, 61, said the tax laws facilitated her recent decision to put the home in which she raised three children on the market. Anderson intends to bank the $250,000 profit and rent for a while in Washington to be closer to a young grandchild and another due to be born this week.

The state of the tax laws "makes it easier" to do that, Anderson said. "I don't have the concerns about it. I don't have to save all my receipts."

The 1997 tax changes even made divorce settlements less complicated, because estranged couples no longer face tax bills when they divide real estate.

The hot housing market has played a significant role in generating U.S. economic growth, economists said. Rasche and Howard J. Wall at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis estimate that 22 percent of the 2.3 million jobs created since the end of the 2001 recession were linked to housing.

The 1997 changes "just released this tsunami of resources and wealth in the housing market," said Brian S. Wesbury, a former chief of staff for the congressional Joint Economic Committee and now chief investment strategist at Claymore Advisors LLC in Lisle, Ill. "I believe the tax catalyst has been essential and in fact we would not have had the housing boom of the last five years without the changes in 1997," Wesbury said in an interview.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2005 The Washington Post Company