Still Correcting This South Dakota Fable
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
In his Aug. 22 op-ed column, Robert D. Novak wrote that then-Rep. John Thune (R) lost the 2002 South Dakota Senate race against Sen. Tim Johnson (D) "by 524 votes thanks to questionable election procedures," but he didn't delineate what procedures were questionable or who was responsible for them.
Our office has corrected Mr. Novak on this in the past. The two elected officials charged with ensuring fairness in South Dakota elections -- the secretary of state and the attorney general (both Republicans) -- have stated that the 2002 election was fair.
Further, Mr. Thune -- now a senator -- to his credit has never argued that the election was lost because of questionable procedures, although others encouraged him to do so. The 2002 race was extremely close but fair, and Mr. Novak did a disservice to The Post's readers by stating otherwise.
DREY SAMUELSON
Washington
The writer is chief of staff for Sen. Tim Johnson.
