Page 2 of 2   <      

Two Vacancies Give Bush a Chance to Solidify Court's Right

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

An analysis of recent voting patterns at the court for the last five terms (not counting the last 12 cases decided this term) by attorney Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Howe shows that Rehnquist has cast a deciding vote in only 14 percent of 361 cases decided during that period.

These included such high-profile cases as Bush v. Gore , which ended the 2000 election, and Zelman v. Simmons-Harris , in 2002, which permitted the use of publicly funded school tuition aid for private religious education. But most of them were relatively minor.

Also, Russell's study showed that there is relatively little room to Rehnquist's right on the court. He cast a deciding vote against Scalia and Thomas only five times.

If Rehnquist had been replaced by "an ideological twin" of Scalia during the court's most recent term, Russell noted, only two of his votes would have been different. But in one of those, plugging in a Scalia clone would have favored a criminal defendant's claim, and in one of them it would have favored prosecutors.

Some academic observers thought that Rehnquist's leadership skills and his human touch would be harder to replace than his ideology.

Certainly it was personal qualities that his colleagues on the court emphasized in their public statements yesterday, with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in a formulation echoed by other justices, praising him as "a plain speaker without airs or affectations." Ginsburg said that Rehnquist "fostered a spirit of collegiality among the nine of us perhaps unparalleled in the Court's history."

At the moment, the court is down to eight members, as O'Connor's retirement takes effect upon the confirmation of a successor.

The last time the court functioned with only eight members for an extended period was in 1987, after Justice Lewis F. Powell retired on June 26 of that year. After the defeat of Robert Bork as a replacement, followed by the withdrawal of a second nominee, Douglas Ginsburg, a successor, Anthony M. Kennedy, was not confirmed until Feb. 3, 1988.

The court had only eight members for 363 days between the resignation of Justice Abe Fortas on May 14, 1969, and the confirmation of his successor, Harry A. Blackmun, on May 12, 1970.

Each time, a short-handed court labored to avoid 4 to 4 tie votes, which automatically affirm a lower court's ruling but create no binding legal precedent.

In an oral history recorded in 1995, Blackmun recalled how he was greeted with a pile of 47 petitions for certiorari that had been held to see whether he would supply a fourth vote needed to hear the cases.

The court now has similar options to prevent tie votes and other anomalies; for example, it can postpone hearing certain close cases until it is back at full strength.

"If [the White House] wants the court not to suffer the way it has in past cases, they've got to get moving," said Dennis J. Hutchinson, a professor of law at the University of Chicago. "On the other hand, if they say, 'We're talking about a 20-, 25-year cycle,' that's more important than the court being stalled in the water for a few months."

By law, Rehnquist's position will be filled on an interim basis by Justice John Paul Stevens, 85, the senior associate justice.

It is the first time an associate justice has filled in for a chief justice who died in office since Justice Hugo Black replaced Harlan Fiske Stone for 63 days in 1946.


<       2


More on the Supreme Court

[The Supreme Court]

The Supreme Court

Full coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court, including key cases and nominations to the nation's highest court.

[Guantanamo Prison]

Guantanamo Prison

Full coverage of the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including Supreme Court rulings over its legality.

© 2005 The Washington Post Company