technorati.setProperty('length',44);
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('Fair Wisconsin\'s No On The Amendment Blog','http://noontheamendment.blogspot.com','The first is clearly wrong. As I mentioned in my rebuttal last week, Connecticut recently became the second state to offer civil unions, and they did so legislatively. Also, California???s legislature passed a marriage bill. It was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">vetoed</a> , but passage was a clear sign that marriage can succeed legislatively. Legislatures have also passed comprehensive domestic partnership bills into law in Hawaii, New Jersey, and California.  The second is also factually incorrect. Owen isn???t even ...');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('Fair Wisconsin\'s No On The Amendment Blog','http://noontheamendment.blogspot.com/2006/08/blog-debate-my-rebuttal-to-question-4.html','The first is clearly wrong. As I mentioned in my rebuttal last week, Connecticut recently became the second state to offer civil unions, and they did so legislatively. Also, California???s legislature passed a marriage bill. It was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">vetoed</a> , but passage was a clear sign that marriage can succeed legislatively. Legislatures have also passed comprehensive domestic partnership bills into law in Hawaii, New Jersey, and California.   The second is also factually incorrect. Owen isn???t even ...');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('Spot-On: Scott Olin Schmidt','http://www.spot-on.com/schmidt','Just fighting the battle at the polls???let alone suffering a defeat???would be ten big steps backwards for civil rights in California.  On the other hand, Governor Schwarzenegger, in vetoing the marriage bill last fall, said that the issue should be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">decided by the courts or the voters</a> .  Within the year, the State Supreme Court will assuredly get a case challenging the discrimination in the State\'s Family Code based on the equal protection provisions in the California Constitution. To overturn such a decision, voters would have to ...');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('Spot-On: Scott Olin Schmidt','http://www.spot-on.com/archives/schmidt/2006/06/arnold_knows_best.html','Just fighting the battle at the polls???let alone suffering a defeat???would be ten big steps backwards for civil rights in California.  On the other hand, Governor Schwarzenegger, in vetoing the marriage bill last fall, said that the issue should be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">decided by the courts or the voters</a> .  Within the year, the State Supreme Court will assuredly get a case challenging the discrimination in the State\'s Family Code based on the equal protection provisions in the California Constitution. To overturn such a decision, voters would have to ...');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('The Last Debate','http://lastdebate.blogspot.com','California." (Incidentally, New York, New Jersey and California will legalize same-sex marriage this year.)   [IMG ]   So let\'s talk about California. Last summer, California\'s Democrat-dominated legislature legalized same-sex marriage, only to have it <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">vetoed</a>  by Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Republican governor. The best part? After the endless rhetoric from Republicans about "activist judges redefining marriage," the Governator said he believed the Legislature acted improperly and that the issue should be ...');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('Neptunus Lex','http://www.neptunuslex.com/?p=80','The inherent incongruity of the representative democratic experiment in an era of propositional plebiscites are perhaps nowhere with more timely plangency revealed than in the Gubernator???s decision to veto a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">gay marriage bill</a>  passed by the state legislature. Regardless of which way you come down on the issue itself, it???s difficult to argue, as did the governor, ???The matter should be decided by California???s courts or its voters.');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('The Official Weblog of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy','http://eacblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/i-lahve-california.html','... into the Republican Party. Who woulda thunk it possible? He was doing a fine job governating for a while, making it seem to the outside world that California might not be as Satan-friendly as it actually is, but then he had to go and ruin it, by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">vetoing the bill that would let atheist homosexual couples marry</a>  ...');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('Mincing Words: Metro Weekly\'s blog for gay and lesbian Washington, DC','http://www.metroweekly.com/mwblog/2005/09/carnivals_of_matrimony.html','...   Gov. Schwarzenegger\'s <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">decision to veto</a>  the recent California legislation that would have allowed same-sex marriage is, of course, completely unsurprising. What is hilarious is his reasoning that the issue properly belongs before the state courts. Meanwhile, back in Massachusetts, where ...');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('Reasoned Audacity','http://www.charmaineyoest.com/archives/2005/09/schwarzenegger.html','...  Schwarzenegger Promises Veto of Gay Marriage Bill  [IMG arnold.jpg]  Governor Schwarzenegger <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">just announced</a>  that he will veto the gay marriage bill that the California legislature passed yesterday.  I\'m surprised. And impressed.  He gave precisely the right reason: the California people passed a Defense of Marriage bill defining marriage as one man and one ...');
technorati.blogs[technorati.blogs.length] = new item('Peace Of America','http://peaceofamerica.blogspot.com/2005/09/same-sex-marriage-aloud-in-california.html','... because Bush is sick and hates gays. Ha Bush they just ripped you a new one. And you can\'t do anything about it because the constitution states that each state has it\'s own laws. And I would love to see your piised of face right now. Read the story at <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con tent/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702020_</a>  ...');