Forest Service Puts Small Projects on Hold
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Sunday, October 2, 2005
GRANTS PASS, Ore. -- From cutting the Capitol Christmas tree to minor forest thinning, the U.S. Forest Service has put hundreds of small projects across the country on hold while it reviews a judge's ruling throwing out limits on the public's right to participate in forest decisions.
However, a forest protection group that won the ruling contended Friday that the Forest Service has gone far beyond the intent of the ruling and appears to be intentionally holding up trivial projects.
"The reason we sued over this, was this allowed them to put in a 250-acre clearcut, an off-road vehicle trail or a prescribed burn next to somebody's home and not allow them to comment on that," said Jim Bensman, forest watch coordinator for Heartwood in Alton, Ill.
Among the projects the Forest Service put on hold is cutting an 80-foot spruce in New Mexico to serve as a holiday tree on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol.
As long as no substantive objections are raised during a 30-day public comment period starting Monday, the tree could be cut and shipped to Washington in time, said James Payne, Forest Service southwest regional spokesman, from Phoenix.
Matt Kenna, a lawyer for the Western Environmental Law Center, said the plaintiffs have offered to work with the Forest Service to clarify what sorts of projects are covered by the ruling, but the Forest Service has refused.
The holdups stem from a July ruling by U.S. District Judge James K. Singleton Jr. in California, which found that the Forest Service was improperly approving projects without public comment or appeals under a process known as categorical exclusions.
After a 2002 fire in Oregon that burned 500,000 acres of national forest, President Bush signed legislation and his administration revised rules to streamline environmental review of forest thinning projects to reduce wildfire danger. At the time, environmental groups complained it was a ploy to allow more logging.
Among the projects the Forest Service is holding up are the salvage of dead or dying trees, the logging of green trees, and small-scale oil and gas exploration.


