Page 2 of 2   <      

Pr. George's Judge Disputes Claim Of Clerical Error in Protective Order

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Ben C. Clyburn, chief judge for the District Court of Maryland, said yesterday that he would not comment on the disagreement between the judges.

Documents in the Cade case file are contradictory. In one document, under the heading "Final Protective/Peace Order," the boxes for "granted" and "dismissed because" are both checked. Under that section, someone wrote, "Dism. Prot. Order."

On Monday, Palumbo altered his docket entry to reflect that Cade's protective order is in effect until July, Brennan said.

This case has renewed a debate about the effectiveness of protective orders and whether they give a person who might be in danger a false sense of security.

The directives are also called stay-away orders, because the judge often forbids the respondent from contact with the petitioner, which includes going to the person's home, job or school. A respondent who violates the order can be found in contempt, arrested and possibly fined or jailed.

Kirk Callan Smith, a D.C. lawyer who handles domestic violence cases, said the orders are effective only if they are enforced.

At the Sept. 19 hearing, Cade told Palumbo: "Your honor, he's violating the peace order. He's contacting my family. He's still contacting me. He's intimidating my daughter, and he's vandalizing other people's property."

The judge responded to those comments by telling her the case was dismissed and she should get a lawyer.

Smith said protective orders can have an empowering effect on the people seeking them.

"On a human level, what you're dealing with is power," Smith said.

"The person moving for the order is seeking protection, and it gives her encouragement. It also gives a strong message to the other party that 'you're not above the law,' " Smith said.

But others, such as Prince George's Circuit Court Judge Vincent J. Femia, call the orders a "Band-Aid."

Femia has had his own problems recently.

Last week, he acknowledged that he had inadvertently released a murder defendant after failing to look at the man's file before issuing an order to let him out of jail.

As a judge in the system, Femia said, he does not find protective orders especially useful.

"I think they are a balm to make women feel better. In my opinion, they make women feel they are protected -- and they are not," Femia said.

"There's nothing I can do that protects you from someone who wants to get you."


<       2


More in the Maryland Section

Blog: Maryland Moment

Blog: Md. Politics

Washington Post staff writers provide breaking news coverage of your county and state government.

Local Explorer

Local Explorer

Use Local Explorer to learn about Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia communities.

Md. Congressional Primary

Election Results

Obama and McCain swept the region on February 12.

FOLLOW METRO ON:
Facebook Twitter RSS
|
GET LOCAL ALERTS:
© 2005 The Washington Post Company