washingtonpost.com > Business > Local Business

Candidates For Top Post Discuss Taxes And Housing

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Tim Craig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 20, 2005

The two Democratic candidates for county executive met Monday in the first of several debates planned before next year's primary election. Although the event was more like a candidates forum than a traditional debate, council member Steven A. Silverman (At Large) and former council member Isiah Leggett spent more than an hour fielding questions from Democratic activists at the Golden Bull Grand Cafe in Gaithersburg.

The gathering exposed early differences between Silverman and Leggett on issues that are expected to be central themes in the race.

On the topic of growth and development, it's increasingly clear that Leggett wants to be known as the candidate who supports limiting growth. "In order to go forward, we have to grow," Leggett said. "It's not a question of growth or no growth, it's a question of growth and slow growth. Believe me, I will slow growth."

Silverman's approach to development appears to be grounded in his desire for more affordable housing. Without new development, he argued, there will be fewer opportunities to build affordable housing, and a shrinking housing supply will continue to drive up prices.

"Let me be crystal clear," Silverman said. "We have to be sure we have a balance of transportation, infrastructure, schools, as well as opportunity for affordable housing, as well as jobs."

But Silverman and Leggett said they want to protect the county's agricultural preserve from development.

One of the biggest disagreements between the two centered on their plans for building more houses that middle-class families can afford.

Silverman's proposal would require developers to set aside a portion of their units for affordable housing. He has introduced legislation to require that 10 percent of homes built in new developments near Metro stations be set aside for middle-class families, defined as earning roughly between $50,000 and $100,000 annually.

Leggett, noting that the county needs more than 30,000 affordable units, said Silverman's approach will do little to increase the supply of housing for middle-class families. He instead wants to construct entire neighborhoods of houses that can be set aside for families who can afford to buy a house in the $300,000 to $350,000 range.

"If you want it, you are going to have to go out and build it," Leggett said.

Leggett offered no details as to where he would build such neighborhoods or who would pay for such a massive construction project. Silverman disregarded Leggett's plan as unrealistic.

"I'm not sure we are going to be able to identify entire communities we can build workforce housing in," Silverman said.


CONTINUED     1        >


More in Local Business

Brian Krebs

Local Blog

Post's local business staff keep you informed on local business news.

Post 200

Special Report

Our annual guide to the top businesses in the Washington, D.C. area.

Metro News

More News

More information about business news in the Washington region.

© 2005 The Washington Post Company